this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
441 points (97.8% liked)

Out of the loop

12571 readers
153 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not very active on Mastodon, but saw this post - browsing the bluesky hashtag for a bit afterwards did not really give me much info. I can definitely imagine enshittification happening there, but what is causing the current drama in particular?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

blusky users concerned with the state of twitter, mastodon users concerned with the state of blusky, lemmy concerned with the state of mastodon. you guys are so boring and shallow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Who are Mbin and PieFed concerned with?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

One of those is not like the others... Did you know Lemmy and Mastodon servers can federate with each other so users can see each others posts and comment, etc?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There's bridges for Mastodon and Nostr to bsky too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, there are even bridges for IRC and email. But those are just bridges, and since the underlying services don't use the same protocols it'll never have the same level of integration as true federation.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IRC users are in pure bliss. Last community to worry about them died of old age and the bubonic plague.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

I atent dead

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Enshittification seems inevitable what with it being based in the US and operated by someone who could just sell it or whatever. But I expect it'll take at least a while longer before I'll feel the need to bail on it like I did Twitter in 2022.

[–] [email protected] 171 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

None of these comments are correct. This is referring to an economist and semafor article. In the article, a democratic strategist said that his “moderate” candidate was bullied off bluesky.

(No doubt because he is super zionist and isn’t doing anything to protect people from trump).

Then some people quoted the article saying bluesky is dying and it got out of hand everyone started repeating it without knowing the context.

All that happened is some center right pro elite politician got criticised so much they left the platform. And now the mainstream media is trying to paint bluesky as “not inclusive” or “too radical”.

https://bsky.app/profile/vulgareconomics.bsky.social/post/3lq3bdtdgks2r

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago

some center right pro elite politician got criticised so much they left the platform.

Sounds like the exact right amount of inclusion and radicalism to me.

[–] ICastFist 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

LOL, the bsky users (blueys? skyes? bskits?) sure know how to bully people, if nothing else. I loved how they treated Adobe some weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an aside, was anyone else hoping the guys who got $40billion for Twitter were going to turn around and start a competitor and blow Elon out of the water?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

The pro move would have been to spin up a mastodon instance and then star an electric car company.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whether it's happening now or later, it's a corporate media site, so it's inevitably going to become enshittified and populated with AI and bots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The only thing I've personally noticed is we seem to have received another burp of magas recently.

It takes very little effort to keep that shit out of your feed on Bluesky if you don't want to see it, so I usually only see the magas when they crop up in comments on George Takei posts and similar.

I'm a big proponent of the "block early and block often" mindset in the fediverse and bluesky, so I do tend to notice how much time I spend blocking magas, and I hadn't needed to do so for weeks until recently. I figured it was from 4chan imploding.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you can subscribe to block lists. heres an example of one that looks for MAGA stuff https://bsky.app/profile/skywatch.blue/lists/3l53cjwlt4o2s

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Careful with those lists though, it's not unknown for bad actors to add innocent accounts to them.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm on several MAGA lists because the dumber sect of Democrats can't understand that people exist to the left of them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Dare not criticize the liberal lest ye be called a conservative.

[–] towerful 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, why does George takei attract magas?
Or is he just a well known & largely followed person on bluesky?

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait, why does George takei attract magas?

Its because he's their most prominent gay, non-white opponent. They don't like it when he reminds them he actually experienced American concentration camps before they were moved to El Salvador.

[–] towerful 31 points 1 day ago

Oh, you mean a decent real human? Yeh, that makes sense they would target him

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well known, largely followed, and often roasts the Trump admin. Same with Mark Hamill. (and yes, GT being gay and open about it does not help!)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Some people are expecting the imminent apocalypse because there's verification now. I don't think it's a bad idea to verify that somebody is who they're claiming to be but what do I know.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

oof. is that what this is about? that's a big thing for some people - especially now.

i know what you're saying with your last sentence, but it also allows people to be tracked down and held accountable for criticizing trumps favourite things.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (25 children)

Not like you have to be verified.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One criticism I saw was that if you want to verify, you have to use a Google Form and log in with a Google account, which goes against lots of people's efforts to get off Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

The other comments are roughly correct in general, but the current drama is because a couple people said "Bluesky is dying" because the number of unique users that liked a post over the past 3 months has gone down (that's the Number that went down), and then a bunch of people got mad at those people because that's a single very specific measure and Bluesky is objectively doing very well and anyway they'd still use it if it wasn't popular etc etc.

Regular internet drama, basically.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not just "hey, look,.traffic is down", but rather a few.folks saying "see, traffic is down because you keep commenting negatively to politicians and journalists "

The stats are trending down, but not precipitously so and still at a level that (AFAIK) eclipses the whole fediverse. And there are plenty of journalists and politicians who engage or endure the negative feedback.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Bluesky is owned by VCs that want money back on their investment. Bluesky are saying they'll do ads.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

I always figured ads were inevitable, but as long as there's no algorithm for me feed and no shadowbanning, I'm happy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Could be referring to Bluesky's silencing of Palestinian voices.

I've seen the open letter linked in that article shared a few times on Mastodon. I'm not sure how big a deal 3000 boosts makes it on Bluesky. But browsing the thread quick and seeing it full of posts shared by the publisher of the letter being deleted is a bit worrying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Same for me. I don't know about the recent drama, but I remember that bluesky censored stuff and now they can't pretend to be an alternative to twitter.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it real Palestinians? Or is it the scammers taking advatage of their situation to wring money out of people? Cause theres a LOT of those on bluesky.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

I don't knoe just personally none of my pro palestinian comments was removed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›