this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
196 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

7379 readers
217 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the last nail in the coffin for Linux. I'm switching to windows.

[–] gsv 7 points 1 week ago

Haha. 🀣 Made my day

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why would they make just 486 CPUs? /j

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

No they made millions. They're just leaving 486 of them behind specifically.

[–] runeko 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's all we needed back on the 90s. Three for the government to run their wargames, one for each major university to run their interwebs pump. one for each blue-chip company to make sure they were complying with trickle-down economics. The remaining were sold overseas to allied countries so they could bootstrap themselves out of the late Renaissance. What a heady time it was to be alive.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

On the plus side, somebody's been working on getting Linux to run on a Commodore-64. So I'm pretty sure the 486 won't be left behind for long.

[–] msage 6 points 1 week ago

Just use older Kernel...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Deebster 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you saying you think it's ridiculous to end support "already"?

I think it's likely that anyone still using 486s isn't updating software anyway, so it's unlikely to matter aside from niches like retro devices. Luckily, open source means that if there's a genuine desire there'll probably be a fork to provide it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Afaik some where still used in space probes in the 2000's.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I remember reading forever ago that NASA was hunting for old 8086 processors from 1978 for the space shuttle when it was still flying.

Found this article from 2002.

[–] LeFantome 2 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

He's obviously working for Big 586.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

planned obsolescence obvs linux is the new microsoft /s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Goddammit, now I have to upgrade my mail server...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you running bleeding edge on your mail server?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

If 2.X was good enough for mah granpappy, it's good enough for me.

[–] LeFantome 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know this is all just in fun but a mail server is one thing I would certainly want a supported kernel on. Security and email are not friends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Damn yeah that's true. Damn time to upgrade that 25 year old hardware haha

[–] LeFantome 1 points 1 week ago

I think you are good on your mail server for a while.

Linux kernel 6.15 will still boot on a 486. You can pair that with MUSL 1.25 (current) and the latest Busybox to create a perfectly viable Linux system.

Debian Trixie is going to be released in a couple months with kernel 6.12 LTS.

As somebody pointed out in a different post, the Linux Foundation will provide support for kernel 6.12 for 10 years after Debian Trixie is released.

https://www.cip-project.org/about/linux-kernel-core-packages

So, there will be a supported kernel that can be compiled for the 486 until mid 2035 at least.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Aww 😞

[–] gsv 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tbh, I understand the problem. There are just so many volunteers for making newer developments work on every platform. Streamlining the development and easing the load on the volunteer devs seems a good idea. Having that said, it’s ofc a pity to drop support for devices. At least the LTS kernels will support the current support for a while and the vibrant Linux community will find a good way to work it out, I have no doubt. Many machines, in particular old ones, run with very old kernels to begin with…

[–] LeFantome 2 points 1 week ago

I won’t repeat the whole message but

https://www.cip-project.org/about/linux-kernel-core-packages

There will be a Linux Foundation supported kernel that can be built for 486 until at least 2035. After that, you might have to backport security fixes yourself.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just as the MiSTer has started putting (sorta) 486s back in people's hands, although if the newly required instructions aren't too complicated, I suppose someone could conceivably add them to the core.

I guess one unknown for me is how the capability detection of the kernel works and if it works on instruction detection or if it determines it via CPUID.

A big also is that I've not yet tried to run Linux on mine yet so I'm not even sure it's possible with a modern kernel anyway. I think I remember seeing someone got an old version of redhat or Debian working

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've seen a whole raft of 386 machines on AliExpress recently. I need to investigate what's actually in them .

Edit: it's just 386s Edit 2: 386 soc on board

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah I believe those are powered by chips originally intended to be used in industrial control use cases.

Loads of old manufacturing machines & software out there that are built around a 386/486, and given intel hasn't exactly been making those models in a good while, some companies stepped up to provide compatible replacements for those situations.

Someone on AliExpress had the idea of using them in a more pc-like product for retro gaming, and voila we have all these modern 386/486 clones

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah they seem to be M6117 386 soc. They're a bit pricey to buy on a whim, but I'll keep an eye out, might be fun to tinker with.

[–] LeFantome 1 points 1 week ago

I just learned that Tiny Core Linux still supports 486 out of the box in their latest release (Tiny Core 16 with kernel 6.12).

http://www.tinycorelinux.net/

Also, Arch 32 still supports 486 as well though I think only non-GUI packages.

https://www.archlinux32.org/architecture/