this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1286 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

7544 readers
2627 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt-text:
I think a lot about how we as a culture have turned “forever” into the only acceptable definition of success.

Like... if you open a coffee shop and run it for a while and it makes you happy but then stuff gets too expensive and stressful and you want to do something else so you close it, it’s a “failed” business. If you write a book or two, then decide that you don’t actually want to keep doing that, you're a “failed” writer. If you marry someone, and that marriage is good for a while, and then stops working and you get divorced, it’s a “failed” marriage.

The only acceptable “win condition” is “you keep doing that thing forever”. A friendship that lasts for a few years but then its time is done and you move on is considered less valuable or not a “real” friendship. A hobby that you do for a while and then are done with is a “phase” - or, alternatively, a “pity” that you don’t do that thing any more. A fandom is “dying” because people have had a lot of fun with it but are now moving on to other things.

| just think that something can be good, and also end, and that thing was still good. And it’s okay to be sad that it ended, too. But the idea that anything that ends is automatically less than this hypothetical eternal state of success... I don’t think that’s doing us any good at all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

At the hill's foot foot Frodo found Aragorn, standing still and silent as a tree; but in his hand was a small golden bloom of elanor, and a light was in his eyes. He was wrapped in some fair memory: and as Frodo looked at him he knew that he beheld things as they once had been in this same place. For the grim years were removed from the face of Aragorn, and he seemed clothed in white, a young lord tall and fair; and he spoke words in the Elvish tongue to one whom Frodo would not see. Arwen vanimelda, namarië! he said, and then he drew a breath, and returning out of his thought he looked at Frodo and smiled.

'Here is the heart of Elvendom on earth,' he said, 'and here my heart dwells ever, unless there be a light beyond the dark roads that we still must tread, you and I. Come with me!' And taking Frodo's hand in his, he left the hill of Cerin Amroth and came there never again as living man.

J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of The Rings, The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 2, last paragraph of Chapter VI: Lothlórien. I bolded the last 8 words.

Aragorn knows to let go, while deeply, profoundly, cherishing what was. Be like Aragorn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Depends on the situation, marriage is something I would see as for life so that absolutely is a failure. The business it would depend, if you are bankrupt that is a failure but if you choose to sell it as you are not enjoying it any more than that is more comparable to retirement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 39 minutes ago

I don’t think it’s personal failure if it entails people/places/things you cannot control. You cannot control the economy, so if it goes belly up and you file for bankruptcy it isn’t your personal failure. You cannot control your partner, so if they start being abusive, it’s not your personal failure to leave them. I think success is being able to adapt to what you can’t control, and failure is not living in reality and trying to make fetch happen.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Working in medicine, especially emergency medicine, I have to hold on to this kind of mindset very tightly. I see death frequently. I have had infants die in my care, and there is nothing I could have done to save them. I have had frail, miserable, elderly people in my care that have been kept alive through titanic and terrible measures, and their lives would have been so much better overall if they had been allowed to pass peacefully a few years earlier.

I saw another post yesterday about the old and infirm lying in nursing homes, staring at the ceiling, coding, then being dragged back to life by the heroic efforts of the staff and the ER....just to go back to staring at the ceiling for another year.

It seems counterintuitive as a physician (in training), particularly in emergency medicine where our whole job is to steal from the reaper, to advocate for sooner, more peaceful, more autonomous deaths. I have always been a proponent of physician-assisted suicide because I have seen too many people whose lives would have been better if they had been shorter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

What feels weird is just how much of fictional media fights in favor of this concept. A hundred evil rich people wanting to live forever, not realizing the terrible consequences behind their immortality elixirs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago

saw another post yesterday about the old and infirm lying in nursing homes, staring at the ceiling, coding, then being dragged back to life by the heroic efforts of the staff and the ER....just to go back to staring at the ceiling for another year.

That explains a lot about the state of software these days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

"If you're not growing. You're dying "

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Some things I think we want to aim at for our entire lives, and those things are good in and of themselves even if we don't achieve them.

I think getting good nutrition, staying in a healthy state/sustaining or increasing our health span so we aren't sick, exercising so we can still get out of bed every day, seeking novelty and variety in the things we do, exploring new places, learning about the world around us and ourselves, sharing all of these things meaningfully with others on a similar journey, and even defending things that mean a lot to us are some examples of this.

The idea that these experiences must last eternally was something Nietzsche talked about this in his works. He rejected Plato's notion of the Forms as well as many religions' concepts of a life after death - this "other world". To Nietzsche, the good life in this world is defined by how far life can stray from its best moments, and that working through hardships and recognizing that they aren't permanent gives us the power of freedom.

Good times must be accompanied by bad or even mediocre times. Good times lasting forever are no different than bad or mediocre times lasting forever. So yeah, writing that book or making that friendship/relationship can be a good thing. And if those things aren't perfect, we have more reason than enough to make them better. Whether that's work shopping the book until it gets better or starting over with fresh new ideas. Whether that's meeting new people and developing those friendships over time, or leaving them for new friendships when other people don't want to reciprocate. I like to think of so many people wishing for good times to last forever are lazy and just don't want to put in the effort to change, which in my view is the whole point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

"Something isn's beautiful because it lasts forever." - some robot

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

While this is true, it stands in contrast to the similar message co-opted to justify or cope with planned obsolescence in gaming. Chess and Odysseus can be good for centuries, so can some mechanical or story based video games.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This translates to tv shows too to prove the point.

Tv shows that only have a few seasons that are high quality start to finish are so much better than tv shows that go on and on and on and on.

For example, the simpsons, whilst an excellent show, should have ended many seasons ago. It's 30 odd seasons in, and it's stale. It's a little funnier recently, but i dont think it will ever be as big as it was.

I would consider it a failed show now but a successful show back when it was popular.

So it's pretty much proof of the point that forever is not the definition of success.

[–] derpgon 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Open ended and no another season planned? Fuck em.

Great TV show that ended well? Sign me up.

This post wasn't sponsored by Good Place (seriously, go watch it, and watch The Selection right after).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Whats The Selection about? The Good Place was amazing and it was a shame they cancelled it. Could have done with just 1 more season.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

The good place is such a motherforking good show

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Don't be afraid to enter the water knowing that you are not going to swim forever.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I think the fear isn't simply exiting the pool, its drowning.

The "coffee shop" analogy breaks down when you look at the before - assuming debt, developing skills, building business relationships - and after - owing more than you earn, filling for bankruptcy, hemorrhaging staff, going back to being a wage earner rather than an owner-operator.

Same with marriage. You get older and slower and tireder, you have this shared history that doesn't exist between anyone else, you have shared assets that can't easily be divided up, you have a shared family.

These aren't just whims, they're economic events and deeply psychological ones, too. Bad ones. They are describing a material decline in your quality of life.

Yeah, the fixation on nostalgia and fandoms is bad for us as a society. No, you shouldn't feel leashed to your hobbies... or your job or your relationships. But there's also feelings of stability and reliability and security that comes with an enduring institution in your life. Knowing you can substitute experience for raw energy and you don't have to relearn a trade or another person or rules to a new game from scratch has value. It pays dividends.

You don't want to get into the water and find out you need to relearn how to swim. Especially when you've so far from shore.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

About marriage: the whole concept reside in the mutual promise of a "forever after". If that's not your thing, totally fine. But then you wouldn't engage in it in the first place? In that sense, the marriage would indeed have failed (to deliver on its core premise).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

Putting aside an afterlife, common wedding vows have "for better, for worse, ... in sickness and in health, until death do us part." So at least for people using those vows, they are committing to stay together until one of them dies. A divorce would mean a failure to follow through with that commitment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

what you're saying is only true for some religions that don't allow divorce. most do. there's no forever after promise in most cases, just living together and caring for each other.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

what you’re saying is only true for some religions that don’t allow divorce.

I've watched people who got married in high school go through divorce in their twenties and thirties and forties. It's more than religion. You come out of the situation angry and insecure. You plunge into a dating pool that's anxiety ridden and full of other jaded people. You carry your own insecurities with you. Often, the divorce is necessary, but it's rarely fun.

there’s no forever after promise in most cases, just living together and caring for each other.

Feeling as though you have someone who wants to be near you and care for you, then waking up to discover that person is gone is extremely difficult.

There's no forever. Everything ends. But the end of a relationship means assuming a great deal of emotional and financial and physical baggage. A home built for two people is radically changed when one is gone.

It isn't something to trivialize or make light of.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Then you shouldn't use that phrase in the marriage vows, that's the issue. If you don't promise the forever, you are not failing the promise

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

it's not a requirement in vows; I'd be surprised if most people did it. your perception is colored by TV and movies which generally uses Catholic traditions because it's more suitable for visual representation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I grew up in a Swedish pentecostal church so my experience in vows are more coloured by experience from that denomination rather than catholic tv

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

fair but still there's a lot of religions and countries out there. where i live people usually just promise to take each other as spouses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

To clarify: I meant this purely at an interpersonal level, i.e. if you enter a marriage, you should at least honestly intend it to endure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

You can blame George Lucas and Star Wars for this.

Do or do not there is no try.

Yoda

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

that's not really what this is about...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I do think it betrays society's lack of present-focused mindfulness. I've had a handful of friendships that I thought would go on to be quite strong and longlasting, but they fizzled out after a while. That's not to say they were bad or failed friendships. I'm grateful for the time I experienced with them.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This feels like moving the goalposts.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago

Yes, it's moving them from 'I have to keep doing this forever or I have failed' to 'Wow I really enjoyed myself doing that!' so the goal can be completed successfully.

load more comments
view more: next ›