this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
55 points (98.2% liked)

RetroGaming

20665 readers
686 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

/r/retrogaming's definition doesn't work anymore now that there are multiple generations that grew up with video games. Just because it doesn't feel retro to the 40 year old who remembers playing the PS2 as a teenager doesn't mean it's not retro. The PS2 is absolutely a retro console, and the PS3 is very much getting there.

[–] ICastFist 17 points 1 week ago

20 years is a good cutoff, in my opinion. That puts the original God of War in retro territory, and I'm ok with that. I'm also ok with vanilla WoW (up to patch 1.8 or so) being retro. These things are old, we're getting old and pretending games from 2005 and before aren't retro is just wishful thinking.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

If it can purchase alcohol it’s retro

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Anything that needs to be played on a CRT.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Old games don’t need to be played on a CRT any more than modern games need to be played on an OLED/LCD flat panel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Then how about anything that plays better on a CRT vs a modern flat screen? Older games were absolutely made with CRT artifacts in mind and look worse on newer screens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I'd say, at 50, imo anything 32 bit and below is retro but there needs to be a new name for the "old" stuff that is 64bit

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything that came out when I was a kid or earlier is retro so anything pre 2000 is retro. Post is modern.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything that came out when I was a kid or earlier is retro so anything pre 1990 is retro. Post is modern.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Anything that came out when I was a kid is retro, so anything pre 1970s is retro. 80s or later is modern.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Retro means new things that look like they're old. As in "looking backwards" for inspiration. Like pixel art. Prime example: VVVVVV.

I'm mostly being pedantic, but it's a pet peeve of mine that gamers (and only gamers) use "retro" wrong. Every other type of collector correctly uses the word "vintage" instead: Vintage clothing, furniture, coins, wine, etc. And they use "retro" to mean new things that look old, like retro clothing. Only gamers call vintage things "retro".

In my experience when I point this out, gamers just get mad. I don't understand that. But I'm kind of a language nerd who watches linguistics videos for fun. And yes, I know language changes and evolves, and words mean how people use them, and dictionaries are not prescriptive, etc., etc. It's still wrong, damnit! It's a niche use by specific group of people that confuses everyone else with its wrongness.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It gets even worse, I more and more see the use of NeoRetro when "Games that looks and feel old" are referenced. We already have words for that, but the gaming scene seems to be fixated on the word Retro alone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Oh, god. I had not heard that yet, but... Ugh...

[–] ICastFist 2 points 1 week ago

... Neoretro? For fucks sake

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Anything before the GameCube, PS2, and Original Xbox.

So PS1, Sega Saturn, and Nintendo64 and older are "retro."

The Atari 2600 and Colecovision are "vintage."

Pong and the Magnavox Odyssey are "antique."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What about Dreamcast? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Just “old”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Original Xbox, GameCube, PS2, Dreamcast - "old."

PS3, Xbox 360, Wii - "modern."

PS4, Xbox One - "previous gen"

PS5, Xbox Series - "current gen"

Nintendo Switch - "2015 smartphone"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But the PS3 / 360 are coming up to 20 years old. Hell, one of my adult colleagues was born after the 360 was released. Can they really be considered modern anymore?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I have a hard time thinking of a console that came with HDMI as anything but modern.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Anything that would make a kid today instantly say “ew, that old thing?” is retro to me. That includes everything up through PS2/Gamecube/Xbox to me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Around 2 generations of consoles ago, or around 10 years, whatever comes "first".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

10 years seems a bit short, that would mean Hearthstone, GTA5 and Sims 4 qualify.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yes that's what I said. PS3 era games and at this point, early PS4 start yo qualify for me. Although still actively developed games aren't "fully" retro, clearly. I'm still on the fence about calling Bloodbkrne retro, for instance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Stuff before ~2000 is retro. It's from the previous century after all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I’d say stuff before ~2000 is retro. It’s from the previous millennium after all, and that seems way older than stuff from just the last century!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It's time to get depressed reading this thread!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

In regards to what feels retro to me, I personally consider Gen 6 GameCube/PS2/XBOX and everything older to be undoubtedly retro.

I think that the Gen 7 Wii, PS3 & Xbox 360 should technically be considered retro now due to their age, but personally generation 6 and earlier is what feels retro to me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The fine line to me is when we started to shift from cartridges to optical media: Dreamcast/PS1/GameCube.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Back in the PS2/Xbox/Gamecube era the SNES and Megadrive seemed to be retro while the PS1 and N64 were just “old”. So maybe 2 generations ago is the start of retro.

I think it’s definitely a lot blurrier now though. The differences between consoles and the leaps between generations are less pronounced, and there are so many y rereleases and remasters now keeping older games fresh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

It goes on vibes. Historically I’d have said anything with an 8- or 16-bit CPU (NES/SNES, Megadrive, the surfeit of home computers before everyone standardised on beige-box Windows PCs). Nowadays I’d say anything slow enough to be emulated reasonably using present-day technology could be said to be retro, so PS2 would count. If video output is analogue PAL/NTSC, that probably also counts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

If it can be emulated on a potato it's retro. If it's it's old but not trivial to emulate then it's classic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Any console that existed before me is retro. I started with the PS1 and N64 so those are modern and all the ones before are retro lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To me, "retro" just means something that is now only possible for consumption through the previous, now impossible or highly impractical, acquisition of said medium. PS3? Retro. 3DS? Retro.

[–] tyler 5 points 1 week ago

This seems like a good line to draw. Does it play natively on current consoles? Not retro. If you have to use an emulator or pull out an older console then that’s retro.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Retro is a style and astetic as much as a function of time or technology.

Even mathematicians struggle with dividing things into precise and consistent sets and categories. Try to relax.

[–] fzz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For me personally, the “retro” is about period ending before “age of ugliest 3D”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tbh I tire of society and it's insurance of putting things in labelled boxes.

It means different things to different people based on their age and experiences growing up.

For me it's PS2 backwards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anything that isn't HD and on a console that's designed to be always online. So PS3 and 360 aren't retro to me, but Wii is, as are most portables prior to the Switch. It's not the age of the game that makes it retro to me, but its design philosophy. And of course any new game intentionally designed to look or feel old is retro, the original meaning of the word.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Anything designed for standard-definition CRTs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If I were in charge, retro would mean games from 5th generation and earlier.

Modern game design hasn't fundamentally evolved since the Xbox, PS2, and Dreamcast (Sixth gen) era. Pre 1998, 3D games were still figuring out how to take advantage of 3D, so they don't quite reach the modern era, but almost all modern games can be traced back to sixth gen.

Likewise, I would classify the early days of 2D the ancient era, which would be anything before the SNES and Sega Genesis (Fourth gen). The NES has classic games, but it wasn't until the SNES that those games were perfected into their modern formulas.

Microsoft, Sony, AMD, and NVIDIA are all betting big in AI so we might finally be entering a new distinct era soon. DLSS 4 is still blurry af, so we are for sure not there yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

anything that came out before 2011

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anything pre ~2000, graphics came on incredibly in the years at the end of the 90s start of the 21 century. The difference between FF7 (1997)

https://idisplayit.co.uk/images/companies/1/products/Blog/Q1%202024/ff7/final-fantasy-7-still.jpg?1707754262295

and FF10(2001)

https://static1.cbrimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Final-Fantasy-X-Cast.jpg?q=50&fit=crop&w=825&dpr=1.5

is vast

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

2 console generations.

After PS3? modern. On or at PS3? retro.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything running 480i/p is retro. If it's higher than that, it's modern.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›