Gaming

So many nice recommendations here but here are some of my recommendations in genres (in top 5 form). All of them have PC ports (but not all of the series may be available on PC)

Platformers:

1. Rayman
2. Sonic
3. Wonder boy
4. Shantae
5. Trine

RPGs

1. Final Fantasy
2. Tales of Series
3. Star Ocean
4. Elder Scrolls
5. Pathfinder

Some noteworthy mentions for RPGs

1. YS
2. Mana

Shooters:

1. Medal of Honor
2. Shadow Warrior
3. Doom
4. Call of Duty
5. Wolfenstein

Puzzles, point and click: Note: This was very hard to list since most of them are standalone and those that are not have interesting plot lines that you will not appreciate unless you play in order such as Syberia, Gabriel Knight, Secret Files. Walking Dead)

1. Myst (You can play in any order but it would be nice to play the sequels or prequels)
2. Broken Sword (Don't touch 4 and 5 but you can play in any order and it would be nice to play the sequels or prequels)
3. Life is Strange (1 and 2 are standalone stories)
4. of Loathing series (It has turned based combat but very fun)
5. Nancy Drew

I would say I prefer them in the chronological order of their release date. Some of the series I have listed completely have either loosely, small references or completely standalone only sharing a "franchise name"

Any action/fighting/shmup franchise because the stories are typically nonexistent/shit anyway:

1. Bayonetta: I recommend the original as a starting point for an authentic action experience, but Bayonetta 2 is more beginner-friendly.

2. Devil May Cry: either 3, or 5 will work—3 if you're after a challenging experience, and 5 if you're looking for an insane combo simulator. 1 could work as an entry point, but it's too old and will not appeal to everyone.

3. Ninja Gaiden: I recommend the original Ninja Gaiden 2 on XBOX (not Sigma) if you're after nonstop action, and Ninja Gaiden Black if you're more of a souls-like fan.

4. Crimzon Clover: World EXplosion is the superior game.

5. Under Night In-Birth: I recommend Sys:Celes because it's the only one with functional netcode.

6. Persona 4 Arena Ultimax because it's the only Persona Arena game, they just started at Persona 4, and the story has tie-ins for Persona 3 and 4.

7. Guilty Gear: start with XX Accent Core Plus R if you need the "the most Guilty Gear" because every character has the most moves they've ever had throughout the series. -STRIVE- for beginners, and Xrd if you find XX inaccessible. OG Guilty Gear is a broken artifact, maybe to be admired, but not taken seriously.

8. DoDonPachi: DaiOuJou: widely regarded as a shmup goat and the best DoDonPachi game. I recommend the Black Label release.

Monster Hunter. There's tons of recurring stuff between games due to the nature of the series, but other than being able to go "hey, I recognize that from this other game!" there's no reason to play the games in any particular order. I'd normally recommend World or Rise to new players, but with Wilds coming out in a month I'd say that's the best option if you have the hardware for it. Wilds is a thematic sequel to World though, so starting with World before Wilds is something you might consider, though it's not really necessary.

The witcher 3 can be played with a great experience even with no background on the series!

counter strike!

The Witcher. The first 2 games are real bad.

Fire Emblem: Three Houses

Hooked me and then I explored lots of the rest of the series!

Uncharted

You can pick up any game in the series and you get a complete story.

Plus imho, one of the best series in recent memory

I've heard you can pick and choose where to start with any sport franchise.

I wouldn't recommend starting with Daggerfall over, say, Skyrim or Oblivion, for example.

Counter Strike

Favourite Series - Recommended Entry Point

1. Final Fantasy - VI
2. Atelier - Sophie
3. Dead or Alive - 5 Last Round
4. Senran Kagura - Burst Renewal
5. Romancing Saga - 2 Revenge of the Seven

I think the better question might be what series should you start from game 1, brcause thats a much tougher question. Just about all the long running ones you can hop in wherever and be fine. Where you wanna start with Mario? Don't matter. Whats the play for Final Fantasy? Probably whatever the recommenders first one was. Megaman? X, 0, or basic its nbd.

Yakuza is one I'd say you either start from the beginning (Technically Kiwami, but 0 is fine) or start at Like a Dragon (7, as it has a new protagonist)

Yeah I was gonna hop in here and say Fallout. New Vegas has all the themes of the classic series with the easier to play gameplay of the 3D era. That said though, I really don't think you can start wherever with that series - IF you want a clear picture of what it's about. I started with Fallout 3, and that definitely muddies the series themes a bit. Fallout 4 comes around and the realistic themes of humanity's repetitive follies are all but thrown out the window to focus on the scifi, retrofuturism, and apocalyptic aspects of the series. Fallout 1, 2, and NV are the continued story of society rebuilding and making the same mistakes we always make as a species. Only the first one is a post apocalyptic game, 2 and NV are post-post apocalyptic with large communities and states starting to form.

No hate on the fun there is to be had exploring bombed out ruins, I still love Fallout 3 and I put in a good bit of time with Fallout 4. But while the West Coast tells the story of society rebuilding, with people making adobe houses reasonably soon after the bombs fell and eventually manufacturing concrete, the East Coast is full of convoluted reasons for why society hasn't rebuilt yet in 200 years and everyone still lives in scrap metal shacks. Not that Fallout games are all realism, but I think the Bethesda games sacrifice the realism of how humanity functions to add more scifi components - and that's just not what Fallout's all about.

I should probably say an actual game series I think you can pick up at any game though, and I'll have to go with Metal Gear Solid. Fantastic story that's convoluted and told out of order. It doesn't matter where you start, you're always going to have fun! I recommend MGS1 for anybody with a day job, and MGS5 for anyone who wants to sink some hours into a sandbox.

Forza Horizon lol

Also Far Cry. No story connection between the games although there is one minor recurring character.

Xcom 2: War of the Chosen

This is, I believe, the last entry in the series. DLC is confusing, but I feel like WotC fundamentally changed things in ways I enjoyed. It added a captain system similar to Shadow of Mordor and has half the main characters from ST:TNG doing the voice acting. I started this series at the very beginning (90's? Early 2000's?) and can recommend only the first and second games. However, consider their age and thus I probably enjoy those old ones out of nostalgia.

With Grand Theft Auto I would say you could start anywhere. Each game features a different protagonist and they play quite different to each other.

I would say playing 4 before 5 is probably a good idea because it doesn't feel like as much of a tremendous leap compare to going from Vice City to San Andreas. Going from 5 back to 4 would probably make things like the car physics stand out even more.

For final fantasy, quite literally just pick whichever one has a theme and/or gameplay style that looks interesting to you. As long as it's not a sequel to a previous game you can pick any.

The only ones with sequels (some prequels) are VII, X, XII and XIII.

Although some could argue with XIII you can also start anywhere.

Very few game sequels are that tied in to it's predecessor narratively that this is an issue. I would say the vast majority of games are designed to be picked up from anywhere in the series.

Even Mass Effect, where you play as the same character throughout a multi game story arc, still has each game giving the player an on ramp, and each game having it's own miniature arc to play through.

I started Wizardry 8 as my first one and it instantly became one of my favourites. Even though the story is somewhat continuation of 6 and 7, not knowing these is not a problem at all. It's still interesting and well explained even for novice players. Much later I've tried both 6 and 7 and even though I felt I could like them and I even liked the hand made graphics, it was the user interface of the early 90s that was just too much for me.

Spelunky, for co-op. I definitely prefer the first game for solo but it only has local co-op. Spelunky 2 has both local and network play but the difference between having a single camera follow the one flag carrier and everybody having their own screens is like playing a different game. Single screen is total mayhem.

For Metroid, start with 2, then Super is a big step up in terms of feel and gameplay. The first one doesn't explain anything at all, and compared to modern standards feels quite clunky and tedious (you have to find multiple secret passages to finish the game normally, for example.) It's worth playing if you're in the mood for NES-era retro gaming, but it can be frustrating trying to figure it out on your own.

For lore, Fusion is next, followed by Dread. I didn't like Fusion, felt too hand-holdy for me, I would skip it but many seem to like it. Dread is worth playing on its own though. It's a much faster pace, more action-oriented gameplay. Fusion added a horror element to the game, but for the most part it's more for vibe than gameplay reasons. Dread took that scary vibe and moved it into the gameplay.

The Prime series I think is a separate canon story. They can definitely be played independently. They follow a storyline and are direct sequels to each other, but gameplay-wise they don't require playing other games before. You don't unlock any important knowledge relevant to one game from playing the previous one.

Start with The Witcher 3 and head back to 2.

Any recommendations on where to start with Dragon Age?

Kingdom Hearts, first game, go in release order.

It's not confusing at all this way like everyone who's only played 2 and 3 says so.

Only complicated thing is that there's games in between the numbered entries and they're crucial to plot and are not side games so it's stupid they numbered only some of them. Even 2 wasn't the second game so they didn't need to call that one 2.