this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
49 points (85.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
730 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Giving money to Amazon, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Google .etc

It's like, you can't have an argument for price gouging, when you're enabling them by spending. If people were smart, they'd stop giving them money 10 - 15 years ago and they'd be right now, trying to reconstruct so they can be more economically friendly than how they are now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Building electric car charging stations without security cameras.

About 75% of the chargers are disabled in my city. The primary method of disabling them is roll up with a sawzall and just chop the cable off. Gets you $5 worth of crack, which is always a nice incentive structure when there’s unguarded copper lying around.

The only chargers that survive are in front of 24 hour businesses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

Believing public figures on camera, or on a dais with a mic in front of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

It's not about "smart" vs "dumb." People's ideas are shaped by their Class Interests and Material Coniditons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A person is smart. People, not so much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Great movie

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Stop generalising groups of people.

I cannot think of a proper example rn, but I see this everywhere.

meme example

group a does x

also group a: says something contradicting x

This happens across the board, not only in political topics.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

They'd stop believing people are stupid, especially those they disagree with, and realize that their differences are mostly made up by the ruling class to keep them in line.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

they would stop wasting their money

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

@yogthos @NeoToasty 🀣 almost got it....just a bit farther;)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

You're not getting cashback on your credit cards yous daft cunts πŸ˜‚ You're paying it in advance

[–] Mesa 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Thinking that they have the "one simple trick" for everything when most matters are actually a complex network of issues where there isn't one answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

And not counting for the variables like what could go wrong, short-term gains, long-term gains .etc

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stop driving (pollution, deaths, cost of living etc) and remodel cities and town around PT and AT , restricted gun ownership

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

How do people living with no PT or AT options stop driving?

Also, the working masses must remain armed to prevent even further class slavery.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago

Stop. Electing. Fraudsters.

Especially when the fraudster is a convicted felon.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I'm doing better now, but 15 years ago Walmart was the only option I had for food. Local/regional grocery stores were more expensive and I was living paycheck to paycheck with growing debt.

"If people were smart they would stop buying the most cost-efficient option" is really not feasible.

"If people were smart" they would read and stop putting oligarchs in power.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

β€œIf people were smart they would stop buying the most cost-efficient option” is really not feasible.

In fact, more and more people don't have the luxury of buying more expensive options.

Of course, stealing is an option, and I think 'If people were smart' they would accept that stealing from Walmart is not an ethical or pragmatic problem, but it's a risky behavior so I wouldn't criticize people for not stealing. [edit: see Fubarberry's reply]

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Stealing from walmart also isn't sustainable if many people are doing it. For example there were a ton of walmarts and other stores in the Chicago area that recently closed due to high theft at those locations. Now whole communities there are left without convenient shopping options, which can be a big problem for people with limited transportation options.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That Walmart CLAIMED were closed for high theft.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

That we haven't learned more from history and keep making the same mistakes over and over.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

Ignoring the fact that alternative voting systems exist and there can be more then two political parties.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They would understand that socialism is not communism. Also you can have capitalism and socialism at the same time, you just have to give and take a little.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

They would understand that socialism is not communism.

Socialism has so many definitions that this can be subjectively true or false. This isn't even some trivial gotcha, the terms were used interchangeably even by significant writers of the 1800s. For another example, a socialist mode of production and a capitalist mode of production are contradictory.

If one wants to make these kind of broad claims without starting pointless arguments, they'll need to use a more specific term than 'socialism'.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

You're wrong about literally all of that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Op probably thinks socialism == Scandinavian welfare states. Most online USA midwits don’t know the difference

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I think of about socialism. The democratic socialist Scandinavian countries

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

The ones that explicitly state they are not socialist?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

If you want your contribution to have any weight at all, you'll elaborate. As it is, it is just worth dismissing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So people can just say whatever shit they want offhanded and not be criticized, but if you want to say they're wrong you have to give exhaustive reasoning and proof for each and every thing, huh?

That's a really dumb thing to believe so I'm wondering if you just speak frivolously without thinking and would like to walk your position back a bit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

As it is, it is just worth dismissing

If we dismiss dismissals, this will go on looping forever. The person they replied to did not elaborate on some very dubious claims, and as is, are just worth dismissing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

I dismiss your answer !

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Do you identify as an American per chance?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I identify as your mom, loser

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That explains the lack of education

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

lol shut up dumbass

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Voting for fascists/not voting

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (8 children)

They'd stop doing capitalism. Entirely. If people in the US were smart, they would have been the vanguard of the communist revolution in the late 1800s when Marxist ideas were starting to spread in the us.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Marxism is critically flawed about surplus value and definitions of egalitarianism unfortunately so while it all sounds nice on paper it never worked in practice

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Except it's currently working in practice in many countries, one of which is more successful by every measure than the US. Also Marxist-leninism is responsible for being more people out of poverty than any other system of socioeconomics.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Drinking alcohol. Lots of people drink way too much and make life ruining decisions.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The obvious answer is fossil fuels, right? Few people want to cook the climate, they just can't quite fathom something that abstract and slow-moving, so they do it anyway.

Less obviously, feeding all our most sensitive data to random websites and apps. Again, the threat just doesn't look enough like a sabre-tooth tiger.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί