this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
48 points (84.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
859 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Giving money to Amazon, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Google .etc

It's like, you can't have an argument for price gouging, when you're enabling them by spending. If people were smart, they'd stop giving them money 10 - 15 years ago and they'd be right now, trying to reconstruct so they can be more economically friendly than how they are now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They would understand that socialism is not communism. Also you can have capitalism and socialism at the same time, you just have to give and take a little.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

They would understand that socialism is not communism.

Socialism has so many definitions that this can be subjectively true or false. This isn't even some trivial gotcha, the terms were used interchangeably even by significant writers of the 1800s. For another example, a socialist mode of production and a capitalist mode of production are contradictory.

If one wants to make these kind of broad claims without starting pointless arguments, they'll need to use a more specific term than 'socialism'.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

You're wrong about literally all of that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Op probably thinks socialism == Scandinavian welfare states. Most online USA midwits don’t know the difference

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I think of about socialism. The democratic socialist Scandinavian countries

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

The ones that explicitly state they are not socialist?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If you want your contribution to have any weight at all, you'll elaborate. As it is, it is just worth dismissing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So people can just say whatever shit they want offhanded and not be criticized, but if you want to say they're wrong you have to give exhaustive reasoning and proof for each and every thing, huh?

That's a really dumb thing to believe so I'm wondering if you just speak frivolously without thinking and would like to walk your position back a bit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

As it is, it is just worth dismissing

If we dismiss dismissals, this will go on looping forever. The person they replied to did not elaborate on some very dubious claims, and as is, are just worth dismissing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 13 hours ago

I dismiss your answer !

[–] [email protected] -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Do you identify as an American per chance?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I identify as your mom, loser

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That explains the lack of education

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

lol shut up dumbass