this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
-12 points (26.9% liked)

Programming

17473 readers
251 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mirror is an entirely new concept in programming — just supply function signatures and some input-output examples, and AI does the rest.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Most general purpose programming languages nowadays are designed to be easily human readable. But with this, I now have to understand the syntax of another "programming language" in addition to the programming language it outputs. How is this helpful in any way?

There are already plenty of template generators that can generate boiletplate code with parameters. This seems like a complete waste of time.

[–] GetOffMyLan 2 points 1 hour ago

The obvious problem is that I would have been quicker to write the function yourself than the examples.

[–] akkajdh999 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So a chatgpt wrapper that compiles a DSL to JavaScript. Ok.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Of course it would output JavaScript. What else?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago
// Hack the mainframe to skim pennies from ongoing transactions
async function addMoneyToMyBankAccount(dollarAmount: number): Promise<"success">

Alright let's go

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

almost like a shitty prolog that won't work half the time!

[–] BatmanAoD 1 points 16 hours ago

Doesn't prolog already "not work half the time"? (Disclaimer: I haven't used it.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't mean this in a toxic way, but this is probably the worst idea I have seen yet with Ai in programming. People should use less Ai, and learn more how to program. It's better in the long term.

https://github.com/AZHenley/Mirror

Is the language and interpretation predictable and exact? If you install a newer version of the Ai, can the exact same code behavior be guaranteed? What's the benefit over using Ai tools that generate code in a static language, instead leaving it to be interpreted?

[–] Reptorian 2 points 15 hours ago

People should use less Ai, and learn more how to program

Yes. Once you know how, you can see pitfalls with AI.

[–] Reptorian 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting, but I never needed AI for coding. Well, twice, and I had to do changes, but would not use AI to generate code.

[–] GetOffMyLan 1 points 1 hour ago

I use the ai daily at work. But more as an interactive docs and refactoring tool.

[–] KindaABigDyl 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Could I do:

signature primes_less_than(x: number) -> [number]
example primes_less_than(2) = []
example primes_less_than(10) = [ 2, 3, 5, 7 ]
primes_less_than(10582319112759318014901241439012831231539517)

?

I don't pay for OpenAI, so I can't try the playground

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

Ooooh, this oughta be good.