this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
233 points (96.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27314 readers
108 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 156 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lemmy user TachyonTele SLAMS news outlets for their unwanted hyperbole!!!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (1 children)

SquirtleHermit WRECKS unwanted hyperbole. Leaves Lemmy user SPEECHLESS!

[–] nulluser 29 points 2 months ago

SCIENTISTS CAN'T EXPLAIN BrundleFly2077's hyperbolic discourse

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

This is BREAKING NEWS if I’ve ever seen it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

They will stop as soon as the word “based” is finished.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Months ago a headline popped up with 'spanked' instead. I'm a little disappointed it didn't take off.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Apparently spanking took off for Fox News

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Was there an actual spanking, or just figuratively?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I’m still waiting for ASS BLASTS’ time to shine

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Stop clicking on those articles, esspecially on platforms that they actually care about, like Facebook and Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Call me pretentious, but I genuinely forget about Facebook and that lots of people still care about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Same, but include anything hosted on Google, Twitter, TikTok, or Rupert Murdoch / fake news owned servers because for me, it’s just “server cannot be found” (DNS blocking) and I move on.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If it's not slam, it's roast.

I think journalists like these words because they're not provably false and therefore can't get sued for misrepresenting what someone said

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

And if, heaven forbid, it's not either of those, it is now apparently acceptable to refer to it as a "clap back." In the newspaper of all places.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do they get sued? Because there is a lot of misinformation out there, and I don’t mean in the far right “fake news” sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It'd probably be slander to say "X said this" when they didn't say it.

"X expresses disgust about Y" could be slanderous if it's not disgust, but "a respectful disagreement", etc.

But "X slams Y"? "Slam" doesn't mean anything. So nobody can confirm or deny that any "slamming" happened.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As said, don't click on it. I also avoid clicking on an any article who's headline is a question

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Also if the thumbnail has obvious ‘ai’ ‘art’

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Also "Here's why"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Like this one

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Stop giving them clicks.

"Audiences slam news outlets for hyperbolic headlines!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's just the current buzzword.

Hundreds if not thousands went before it and many more will follow.

Think of it as an in-built historic timestamp.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

It has been a couple years tho

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's like an old 100 yo trend of writing headlines except it has gotten much more "slam"-filled. Crash blossoms / headlinese has evolved over time.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Stand outside the editors window blasting the OST to space jam (the first one of course) everytime they publish such an article.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

So, put them on blast?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Everybody get up, it’s time to slam now!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Get everyone who reads articles to stop clicking on any headline that includes the word. Then they'd pay attention.

In other words, only a significant drop in clicks would drive any change.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Slam! da duh duh, da duh duh, let the boys be boys.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If we could just let the boys be boys maybe this whole SLAM thing would just go away

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it's not "slam", it'll be something else just as bad. Be careful what you wish for, or it might be replaced with "obliterate" or "wreck" or something worse.

Instead, how about we get news outlets to stop writing ambiguously abbreviated headlines as if they still needed them to fit on a page? "Stud Tires Out" could mean two wildly different things, and you can easily fit a couple more words into the 80% of the screen you've filled with ads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Kamala low key yeets shade at Donald Trump over cappin 💯 💯 fr.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You gotta slam them back. Slam for a slam

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

“Beloved slam is slammed by lemming, news at 11”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Don't worry, soon they'll catch on to "cooked".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

That's an easy one - change it for them!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

This donut is SLAAAAAAAAAAAAAMIN!!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I personally want to stuff every journalist into the nearest paper shredder that continues to use the stupid word, "unprecedented". Ha ha, the pun is dead, stop beating it so damn hard. :eyeroll:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Is that overused? I can’t think of a time I’ve read that and disagreed, and I haven’t seen it used often (especially in headlines).