this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
94 points (90.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27049 readers
1318 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

At least on the communities i follow. Every so often I come across a thread where i recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members and I haven't even been on lemmy that long.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a smaller neighborhood here dude.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, it's just the cold water.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

cozy. lets just think of It as cozy, why don't we... ahhh, much better!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There's definitely regulars I recognize, but still plenty more I don't.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Yeah, there are a handful of extremely prolific posters who are awesome and keep the whole thing fresh. Then there are a couple dozen that I see at least a few times a week if not more. After that, I see a mix of familiar and unfamiliar faces.since I scroll All.

But even reddit had a similar pattern on a larger scale proportionate to the userbase. There were like a dozen prolific posters (or bots) whose threads got the most engagement even when they were reposts of someone else'searlier post.

I like to think of it like movies and tv, where a few prolific actors and actresses are everywhere and in things that get a lot of attention, but there are also a ton of people also participating but without as much attention because they are in fewer popular things.

If someone browses hot or new they will absolutely see the same few people the majority of the time since those are the most active people. Browse Active and there are a lot more that arrived a few hours after the post was made.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Part of it is also because you will notice the people you recognize, but scroll past the people that you don't.

Having to check over usernames from the moderation side, I notice a lot more variety than I'd think about otherwise

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because it is dawg.

Total users are like ballpark 1 million, and most don't post much or at all -- e.g the 1-9-90 rule.

By comparison Reddit and twitter are the most trafficed sites on the internet

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

‘Had to look up the 1-9-90 rule

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (13 children)

That's very much possible.

That's why I try to be as nice as I can on here.

There are very few times when I initially joined Lemmy where, I admit, I was a bit shitty towards some users (old Reddit habits). This can get you banned, or blocked, or you can build a reputation pretty quickly. And since we're not a lot, that can limit your interactions quite a bit. So I changed my attitude pretty quick. And frankly it's been much more enjoyable this way since.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Reddit did things to us all. You couldn't like be nice to someone bc you would get your ass handed to you. EVERY comment had to be so defensive, and primarily what worked was snark. Here... is different, most of the time (and when it's not, we can block and move on:-).

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I can’t speak to Lemmy specifically but my Reddit years were ages 15-30. I think I got my fill of arguing on the internet then.

I write a lot of comments on Lemmy that I end up deleting before posting because I just don’t want the hassle of arguing with someone about it who is being deliberately obtuse or arguing in bad faith.

That’s not an indictment of Lemmy specifically, but I think my lack of interest in those arguments comes with age and I suspect my story isn’t unique, the demographics will line up for a lot of Lemmy users.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

It’s called a community. If Reddit doesn’t seem like this anymore, it’s because half those people are actually AI.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (24 children)

Smaller community, so the power users (like myself, FlyingSquid, The Picard Maneuver and others) will undoubtedly be more prevalent than the many, many other users that barely post at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I do in fact recognize all those users including you

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I literally scrolled through looking for your comment.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Honestly, that's one of the cool parts of old internet (forums, chatrooms, etc.) is getting to know people, you get to know the community 😊

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not usually an internet commentor, but I try to chip in on Lemmy sometimes. I think most people just treat it like the rest of social media today, where the smart idea is to just lurk

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I guess it makes sense that the majority of the userbase is just lurkers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I have no idea what you're talking about.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Be the change you want to see. Post and comment. Start a sub.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Like the others said, the ratio of posters/lurkers on most social media sites is 10/90, and i think that lemmy is on the better, more active side of things. in a 30k community that means that you will see about 300 people commenting regularly, and 30 of them will be very active.

i also like the smaller scope here, fewer comments mean that my opinion will be engaged with more.

I rarely commented on reddit, because one little comment in a swarm of 2500 will not even be noticed. It's different here, and i wrote over 400 comments this year! i maxed out at about 100 on reddit because my comments wouldn't even be noticed most of the time if i didn't filter by new.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The majority of individuals on platforms like Lemmy—and social media more broadly—engage almost exclusively as passive consumers. Their involvement often begins and ends with the simple act of upvoting or downvoting content. This limited interaction speaks volumes about the nature of digital engagement, where consuming information or entertainment takes precedence over meaningful interaction or contribution. The absence of deeper engagement is not a failing of the platform itself but a reflection of broader societal tendencies.

People, in general, tend toward passivity, a trait that extends beyond online spaces and into areas like civic participation. In the United States, for example, voter turnout remains notoriously low. People express their dissatisfaction with the status quo, they crave change, and they criticize institutions, yet they shy away from taking the minimal steps required to enact that change, often hiding behind a hand-waving comment involving the words "systemic," "structure," and/or "institutions," a transparent way of excusing their unwillingness to actually act. As though they themselves are not parts of those systems, structures, and institutions. The same individuals who will upvote or downvote content online without a second thought are often the ones who abstain from voting in elections, an "upvote/downvote" that directly impact their lives.

What is even more concerning is that this passivity is not merely a result of laziness or apathy, but something ingrained and encouraged by modern society. Our institutions—whether educational, political, or corporate—tend to value compliance over initiative. Decision-making, once seen as a marker of personal agency and responsibility, is increasingly viewed as a burden. People have been conditioned to prefer being told what to do rather than take responsibility for their choices.

If a decision goes wrong, there's an inherent comfort in being able to place blame on someone else. This social conditioning makes being passive, fading into the wallpaper, not only acceptable but desirable for many. And yet, these same people will often feel deeply dissatisfied with their lives. But, rather than do something about it, they continue to be helpless, wishing someone would decide for them to improve their lives and then forcing them to do it.

While it's easy to express frustration with the passive nature of online participants, it is also, sadly, understandable. They are products of a society that rewards inaction more than action, where engagement is often reduced to the simplest and least effortful gestures. These platforms reflect the broader societal trend toward disengagement from real, consequential decision-making, reinforcing and reflecting a vicious cycle of passive impotence while they wait for someone or something to fix things for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I almost never comment on anything. I imagine most users are like me.

Yes, I do see the same names popping up all the time.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Small town vibes where you actually recognize people at the grocery store kinda thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Be the shitpost you want to see in the world.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm commenting to boost engagement!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm engaged in your comment

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am engaged with your engagement.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes. I've been posting to subs around here too. I like it cause everybody will probably see your post and you'll get engagement from real people. We also have common interests on here that things are pretty interesting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

There's one user that seems to be everywhere and it's probably the same user everyone is thinking of right now lol.

I'm also surprised I come across other "agents" on here more frequently than I would expect.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

The ratio of commenter/poster to lurker is always pretty lopsided. I also never read user names.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The trick is not to read the usernames. I imagine myself surrounded by millions of mostly sensible people!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

everyone reading this should introduce lemmy to at least 1 cool person in their life. thats what it needs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Got it. Creating bot accounts now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

There are prolific posters and some bots that post nearly half of the content that gets popular on a particular day. Commentors I think there's a healthy mix of regulars and users I don't recognize.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Does anyone recognize me?! I need validation for my useless contributions. Valor and accolades!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›