insight06

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The trick is not to read the usernames. I imagine myself surrounded by millions of mostly sensible people!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I appreciate you

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

This is the kind of take I would expect from corporations trying to maximize sales of both electric and gas vehicles. Zero interest in actually addressing climate change, just bare minimum posturing.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago (9 children)

A good decompiler and an auto-formatter might leave them with a nicer copy of their source code than they had in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (5 children)

"brown" has left the chat?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

EQ is earthquake. According to USGS, California faces a ~75% chance of a major earthquake in the next 100 years.

Have a quick google of "California quake risk" for a slew of in-depth (and somewhat scary) articles and research papers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I would have thought California EQ was the peril scaring them all away. Very expensive to reinsure - most commercial property catasrophy models (RMS & AIR are the big ones) peg it as the second most risky North American peril after Florida Hurricane.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I appreciate you exploring your sense of humour, but let's stop using gay as an insult.