this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
127 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58691 readers
3838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some of the top browser makers around have issued a letter to the European Commission (EC) alleging that Microsoft gives the Edge browser an unfair advantage and should be subject to EU tech rules.

A letter seen by Reuters, sent by Vivaldi, Waterfox, and Wavebox, and supported by a group of web developers, also supports Opera’s move to take the EC to court over its decision to exclude Microsoft Edge from being subject to the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

As Edge comes pre-installed by default on Windows machines, users must navigate the Microsoft offering in order to download their browser of choice. The letter states that, “No platform independent browser can aspire to match Edge's unparalleled distribution advantage on Windows. Edge is, moreover, the most important gateway for consumers to download an independent browser on Windows PCs.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I’m not defending Microsoft… but if we’re going to go after a tech company for leveraging their other assets to give themselves an unfair advantage can we also go after Google?

In the first releases of Edge, Microsoft tried to build a new web browser from scratch to compete with Google Chrome. By google kept changing YouTube’s code so that videos would playback janky on Edge. Microsoft eventually gave up trying to fix for YouTubes ongoing changes and now Edge is based on Chromium (the same open source web browser maintained by Google, that chrome os built on). Google leveraged YouTube to prevent completion from Edge.

And now Google is blocking ad blocking extensions so that users are forced to see more google ads in their browser.

Microsoft’s has leveraged their unfair advantage to get a little over 5% market share.

Google’s leveraged their unfair advantage to get 66% of the market.

Both companies need a hard smack down, but I want to see Google taken down too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any source that YouTube is the reason that Edge switched to chromium?

I'm betting it's just cheaper and easier than making their own engine.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They’re was never any evidence of google’s wrongdoing, the accusation came from former MS edge developers:

https://www.developer-tech.com/news/edge-developer-google-youtube-chrome-browsers/

Officially Google denied it:

https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/19/18148736/google-youtube-microsoft-edge-intern-claims

You may be right, this could have been MS couldn’t make a better browser and pulled the plug, and the devs just blamed google.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Old Edge was a better browser

more responsive/lower overhead

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please, please do act on google too. Didn't knew about YT thing, but god I loved Spartan Edge. It was soo...resource unintensive. It...simply did it job, was quick, low resource, looked good... :( I switched to it from chrome and then it became chrome.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

YT does a lot of sneaky sneaky stuff. My Firefox constantly lagged on YT pages until one day I installed UserAgent-Switcher and pretended I was a Chrome. The lag went away.

And no it doesn’t work now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its working for me now, I tested it this morning. Even tried swithching the user agent back to Firefox and yep - Youtube gets magically some buffering problems with it.

Close youtube tab, switch user agent back to chrome, clear cache and restart the browser: no buffering problems. What a bunch of assholes.

I've reported this earlier to EU competition ombudsman, like a about a year ago, and they confirmed then that they were getting reports about the issue, Google of course denying the practice. Hopefully they are working on some punishment for Google in the background.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

You could say the same about Android and iOS. They are preloaded with a web browser not many people change. In fact I've noticed that many users (mostly older) using Android don't even know what browser they are using, since they just type shit into Google widget on their home screen.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

IIRC Samsung devices default to a Samsung web browser labelled "Internet". You wouldn't want to disable the "Internet", right?

iOS seems even more egregious, where it's internally using Safari no matter what browser you install, giving the illusion of choice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The google widget search bar is the thing I hate the most on default Android ui, alongside stupid bixby. Like the windows search bar, it doesn't look good, always stays there and isn't actually useful since you can still search with sometimes one click sometimes two. And the results are horribles with filled MSN-like news

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And some linux distros bcs somtimes it's preloaded with firefox and chromium and also macos with safari

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Fuck, this. My gf doesn't even know what a "web page" is, she just knows this Google widget.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

MS is literally back to square one its about damn time.

They're even worse now and aggressively pressure you to use edge if it's not the default.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess it could be said that Edge has an unfair...edge?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Take your upvote and gtfo. Lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yikes, all these browser-based puns are a bit much for this little internet explorer. I'm out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think youre just going to have to Brave through it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I completely understand where this is coming from, but I'm just a little confused about what the solution would be. For the average consumer and certainly the target users for Windows, shipping with a browser is the expected norm, and none are expected to open a terminal, much less run tools like winget. I guess you could have a setup dialog of major browsers to choose from?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I can think of some options

Level 1: Allow uninstall of edge. They can have the engine still for store/background processes, but no user icon. You can use edge to install other browsers then remove it.

Level 2: same as level one, but it comes "uninstalled". OOBE asks you to choose a browser.

Level 3: They rip out the deep integration they knew damn well they shouldn't have done because their asses were handed to them in the IE days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Click 'browse web' Microsoft gives a list of popular and mixed browsers that the user can select. Microsoft then installs selected browser. At least this is the only tangible way I can see.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone else remember this badboy?

For the uninitiated, BrowserChoice.eu was a popup and associated website that Microsoft was forced to create by the EU courts becasue of their monopoly in 2010.

Also, an opinion: Edge was a great browser even before they switched to Chromium. I wish they'd kept at it so there was a better variety of rendering engines out there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, I'm really confused about this article - isn't what you describe still in effect? Why on earth not? (I haven't used Windows in ages so I personally have never seen that.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

One solution could be during PC initial setup, a list of all browsers above a certain user count is given and the person chooses which to install and use as default with the ability to change at a later date.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's like the mid 90s all over again. Let's see if anything happens this time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please submit a second copy of that letter, but replace Windows with Android, PC with Mobile, Microsoft with Google, and Edge with Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Please submit a third copy of that letter, but replace Windows with iOS, PC with iPhone, Microsoft with Apple, and Edge with Safari.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (11 children)

As Edge comes pre-installed by default on Windows machines, users must navigate the Microsoft offering in order to download their browser of choice.

What's the actual alternative they want here? That users look up download URLs on other devices and download their browser of choice via command line using ~~cURL~~ Invoke-WebRequest? That ISPs provide browser installers on USB sticks?

Also, it's not like MS is cornering the market on browser share here. Even with this "unfair advantage" they've only scraped together a 5% slice of browser usage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Invoke-WebRequest

To comply with the court decision, Microsoft have added a super easy to use PowerShell command to install your favourite browser!

ps> Get-Browser-That-Isnt-Microsoft-Edge -Q -Browser Firefox -NumberOfNags 0 -RevertAfterUpdate False -When Now -Why BecauseTheCourtsToldUsWeNeededTo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

IMO edge coming pre-installed isn’t a big deal. But I’d like to be able to uninstall edge and not have Windows periodically try to trick me into setting edge as my default browser again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For a while when you installed Windows, the first time user setup gave you a choice of popular browsers and it handled the download and install.

Now Microsoft is actively trying to sabotage other browsers with popups and office apps bypassing the default browser setting.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As it's based on chromium, I'd call what it has a handicap and just keep on using Firefox.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue isn't how it's built or based on its that Microsoft can use its control of the os to make it extremely difficult to avoid it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

so does Microsoft Windows

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

One might even say it has an... Edge

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Ooo what about safari on mac? Isn't it the same thing but just not as hated?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Forget mac, it's even worse on iOS/iPadOS, where all third-party browsers must use Safari's rendering engine too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Haven't they been told they've got to stop doing that now?

I thought the European commission had forced them to allow other browsers to actually use their own render engines

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] towerful 7 points 1 week ago

The issue is with how aggressive Microsoft is about it.

Trying to download chrome? "Hey, are you sure you don't want to try Edge?".
Changing default browser? "Hey, are you sure you don't want to try Edge?".
Windows update... "We've done you a solid, because we know you want to use Edge".
I'm sure at one point, it was a warning in the security center that you aren't using Edge.
Also Teams (in sure there are others) will open links in Edge, despite what default browser you have set.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

An out of the box OS should include a browser. Microsoft takes a ham-fisted approach, however, Apple makes it entirely possible to uninstall Safari. You do have to jump through the hoop of disabling System Integrity Protection to remove it, but it's simple as trashing the app and deleting the data. I speak from experience. Very easy to do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Seriously, showing a pop up confirmation if the user tries to uninstall the last browser on the device is all that is needed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (15 children)

why go after microsoft.

Go after fucking google.

Chromium is the plague, not Edge.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›