this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
9 points (62.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26503 readers
945 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe I'm wrong, English is my third language though ...

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Do you mean where people use it as an adjective? E.g., 'This house is very aesthetic' where they mean 'beautiful'?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

How are people using it wrong? How should it be used instead? We (I) cannot guess context..

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

People use a lot of words incorrectly on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Literally, for sure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ahem, it's "alot"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

for example, 'Internet' is a proper noun and should always be capitalized

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, it'd only end up in the dumpster.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There was a viral short featuring someone using it wrong, a bunch of younger people cribbed from the video and started using it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, just so I don't get annoyed and be boomery about it, what is the new incorrect usage?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Using it as an adjective, to mean "has a pleasing aesthetic."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Using it as an adjective, to mean "has a pleasing aesthetic."

Isn't that the proper usage?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

No, "aesthetic" is generally just a noun, historically. As in "it has a modern/minimalist/cyberpunk aesthetic." Its usage as an adjective just means "relating to the general idea of aesthetics as a field of study," or "someone with a strong sense of and attunement to the design and beauty of things." Using it to just mean "beautiful," basically, is a new usage in just the last 5 years or less.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Then your example should have been "this house is aesthetic". Aesthetic is being used as an adjective.

Saying "this house has a pleasing aesthetic" is correct. Aesthetic is being used as a noun. "Pleasing" is the adjective. While the aesthetic is not defined enough to your liking, it isn't being used as an adjective.

Use your original wording and replace the word "aesthetic" with the word "quality". "This house has a pleasing quality" is a proper sentence. Sure, there's ambiguity as to what that quality is (is it the shape of it? Is it the color? Perhaps the landscaping?), but it isn't grammatically incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Using it as an adjective, to mean "has a pleasing aesthetic."

The commenter was telling you how they use it, not giving an example. The commenter told you what the adjective means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

? You're saying exactly the same thing I am. I was giving a definition, not an example. Admittedly confusing since I used the (real) word in its own (slang) definition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I missed "to mean". Looks like at least one other guy did, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It might come from non native speakers too. For example in french using aesthetic as an adjective to mean "beautiful" is correct, and it may be true in other romance languages.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Then your example should have been "this house is aesthetic". Aesthetic is being used as an adjective.

Saying "this house has a pleasing aesthetic" is correct. Aesthetic is being used as a noun. "Pleasing" is the adjective. While the aesthetic is not defined enough to your liking, it isn't being used as an adjective.

Use your original wording and replace the word "aesthetic" with the word "quality". "This house has a pleasing quality" is a proper sentence. Sure, there's ambiguity as to what that quality is (is it the shape of it? Is it the color? Perhaps the landscaping?), but it isn't grammatically incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It is the proper usage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's a lot more understandable when you think of it as an abbreviated form of "This is very aesthetic(ally pleasing)."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

It’s an aesthetic decision.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, try to find a word people are using right on the internet. That's the real challenge

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Itso ironic right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Words take on new meanings sometimes due to cultural experiences, and the new usage of the word is one of those meanings.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, yeah, language is dynamic, but there are so many fad uses of words that are caused by people not knowing the real/original/normal use of the word and then spread by the Internet and then forgotten as quickly as they began. If not for social media, these would be limited to 12 middle schoolers at band camp. This feels like one of those.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Have you heard of "false friends?" Words that have come from one language into another, but due to use have completely changed meaning along the way, often to mean the exact opposite of their original meaning. This is common enough that, especially if you speak a Latin based language and learn English as a second language, you'll see them everywhere.

My point is, that this is not an internet phenomena and has been a feature of languages since there has been language. Some don't last long, others are so embedded in our lexicons that we don't even notice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

You kind of just described what a meme is

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, but Jesus Christ fucking up part of speech is a childish mistake to embrace. Maybe we shouldn't just go along with every fuckup people on Tic Tok lean into.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hate to break it to ya boss but part of speech is descriptive, not prescriptive. Childish would be insisting that every word stay in the tidy little box assigned to it rather than recognizing and appreciating language's flexibility and constant evolution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep, real childish of me to insist that our goddamned primary communication protocols remain consistent because it would cut down on fun improvisation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

consistent language

Forsooth, I find thy point fit only for the jakes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That level of change took centuries and I still understand it.

The internet speeds up change to the point where we'll lose intelligibility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't there a cloud nearby that needs yelling at?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

There is an appropriate xkcd for this.

[–] Feyd 4 points 2 weeks ago

AESTHETIC

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't very aesthetic in high school. I preferred video games to sports.