this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
223 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

58180 readers
4781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

Legal plagiarism machine

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

I think this is pretty blatant. Sadly, I don't think there is anything we'll be able to do about this. The onus is on you and the prosecution to prove that they did.

I thought the fallout from that would lead to companies being careful about the AI voices they use for things like product demos and tutorials...

Oh, honey...

[–] [email protected] 43 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Oh so I guess piracy is fine if it’s citizens getting robbed huh? Funny how that works.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Sony will pirate from anyone who isn't Sony. Same with Time-Warner. Same with Columbia. Same with every studio, every label, every publishing house.

Absolutely no-one in the industry takes piracy seriously until it's their own stuff being pirated by someone else.

Moreover, they all are used to Hollywood accounting, in which lawyers try to justify not paying someone for work whenever they can.

Hollywood. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villany.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago

I think you misspelled capitalism.

[–] recursive_recursion 80 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism: steal first, apologize with no real repurcussions later

[–] [email protected] 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sadly, it was Grace Hopper who said "It's easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission."

Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper (9 December 1906 – 1 January 1992) was a U.S. Naval officer, and an early computer programmer. She was the developer of the first compiler for a computer programming language; at the end of her service she was the oldest serving officer in the United States Navy.

That brings me to the most important piece of advice that I can give to all of you: if you've got a good idea, and it's a contribution, I want you to go ahead and DO IT. It is much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.

  • The future: Hardware, Software, and People in Carver, 1983
[–] [email protected] 21 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Except she probably wasn't referring to identity theft; just how to handle dumb shits in management.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

Dumb shits in military management. And she was an admiral; near the top of that management.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, there's some key qualifiers in there

if you’ve got a good idea, and it’s a contribution

Identity theft is neither a good idea or a contribution to society

[–] [email protected] 35 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

We are going to need much stronger image rights for individuals in the AI age.

There’s no way to stop the technology itself (although current development may plateau at some point), so there must be strong legal restrictions on abusing it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, the genie is out of the bottle on this one. I can do voice cloning with consumer hardware and available models. That can't be undone, but good legal protections would be nice.

That said, the Johanson case is a bad example because it really didn't sound much like her at all. It was a chipper yound white lady sound, but to my ear sounded nothing like Johanson. It did sound kinda like a character she voiced, but I would not gave confused the two. They cloned the voice of someone they paid to give a similar inflection as the voice from Her. That's far removed from cloning Johanson herself. It is closer to people making music "in the style of".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Do you want the rich to be richer? Because that's how you make the rich richer. People like Scarlett Johanson will be able to license their likeness for millions or billions. Of course, we would have the same rights; the same rights to own a mansion and a yacht. Feeling lucky?

That's the kind of capitalism that Marx rages against: Laws that let people demand money without contributing labor.