this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6444 readers
461 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why have a P-38 when you can have a F-38!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

2×F16=1E2C

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Thats the joke.

The P-38 is a WWII era twin fuselage fighter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No. It's a twin engine fighter. It only has one fuselage. The fuselage is the main body of a plane, which holds the cabin for the pilot in this case, which there is only one.

Edit: The concept here in the top left would've made it a twin fuselage plane. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a3/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning_fighter_concept_silhouettes.png

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if the co-pilot is in the other side? He could become the pilot if something happened to incapacitate the pilot, and can also cast a tie-breaking vote in the senate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vice Pilot Kamala "Bomber" Harris

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

God, if she said "Putin had sowed the wind and now Moscow shall reap the whirlwind" that would get all of my votes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I stand corrected, didn't think it through that much.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Technically an interceptor, but in reality A FUCKING BADASS KILLING MACHINE.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Glad someone got it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

the above is more like an XP-82 than a P-38.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Putin should've thought twice about invading Cloud City

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

He never accounted for Lobot

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

A tomcatamaran.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

THAT is some class A photoshop work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that like a class A misdemeanor

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your face is a class A misdemeanor

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

That’s not what your mom said. She let me off with a warning.

A firm warning.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Also, if you cast enlarge on an F-16, radius-based spells get pretty powerful.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It worked for the ‘stang; it can work for the viper.

~go~ ~the~ ~distance~

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s all alone ^all^ ^alone^

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All alone in his time of need

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

He’s jinking

and plinking

and plotting his coords

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Somebody needs to remove the "Non" from this forum, because I find this completely credible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that an F-32 or an F-256?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Do they have to mind link the pilots together to be able to work completely in tandem like in Pacific Rim? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Hey I know a twin pod cloud car when I see one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago