If you’re using reset with uncommitted changes and you’re not intentionally throwing them away, you’re doing something wrong. git reset —hard
means “fuck everything, set the state to X”. I only ever use it when I want to throw away the current state.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Resources
Rules
- Follow programming.dev rules
- Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
- No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.
Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Well yeah I think the point is you're human and you might make a mistake.
Using git reset --keep
would just make more work since I'll have to throw away uncommitted changes anyways. Removing uncommitted changes is kind of the whole point, it is called 'reset' after all. If I want to preserve uncommitted changes, I'll either stash them or commit them to a temporary branch. That has the added benefit of adding those changes to the reflog so if I screw up later I'll be able to recover them.
Let me live with my mistakes
~~Waddyamean "that's what backups are for"~~ Sorry, wrong community
Not many people back up continuously, so this is still useful.
This is great advice. I did not know that '--keep' was an option, and have offen done rather lengthy work arounds to achieve this.
I do not actually understand the use case of —keep
over the default —mixed
, which I use regularly to restage patches or fuckups. I very frequently use —hard
to test something out and blow it away without worrying about any changes. This whole conversation is fascinating because it highlights just how different everyone uses git and equally how bad sweeping generalizations like “—hard
is something to avoid” are (without incredibly specific caveats).
It seems like —keep
makes sense if you’re not using stash
before trying to change history when you have local, uncommitted changes? That might be why it’s not clicking with me; any time I fuck with history I stash
anything local I might want to keep.