Americans will literally do anything except build trains
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
859 points (98.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
5467 readers
4 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
4 kms across the ocean: 
now that we have this river across the whole country, we can finally introduce swimming cars!
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Well, the Panama Canal is exactly that, built mostly that way.
Panama Canal is the biggest NIMBY project ever
Because it was built at the thinnest part of the content and used existing lakes?
Pretty sure Omaha would have loved an East\West canal across the continent.
It connected several lakes in the narrowest part of the continent. Not ‘exactly that’ at all
If they could do it in ancient Greece then Americans can do it today for sure!
Stolen from [email protected]
Also: although planned over 2000 years ago, it wasn't really made by ancient Greeks. They gave up and made a road to transport ships on it instead of actually digging. Only in modern time did they actually finish the canal
Wait... They had a movable pool that they rode the ships into and then horses dragged to the other waterway? That sounds awesome
They more or less put wheels on ships or rather loaded them on trailers and simply dragged them over land. Funny thing is that Thucydides (460 BC–395 BC) wrote about this, and described it as an ancient practice!
https://www.amusingplanet.com/2018/09/diolkos-ancient-trackway-that-carried.html?m=1
Better even. They made the movable pool quite long. So while the horses dragged the pool the ships could still sail in it. That way the horses didn't need to drag the pool the whole way!
I dont think so. Not in this case at least. They gave up digging in the hard rock and instead made a limestone road to drive them on dry surface.
This is the Corinth canal but before it was made the paved road for transporting ships was called Diolkos
I know. I was just expanding on the other persons joke (I assume he joked). :)
You are a good person for being this patient and sharing your knowledge.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I love the 1950s, the solution to any problem was just "idk, have you tried nuking it?"
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
"I get my kicks... on Canal 66."
You might need to account for an extra day or two to dig down low enough in the rocky mountains. Unless you're working with a friend and they brought their own shovel.
My first thought was if this was remotely possible on this scale, how many things would be disrupted and changed from the water movement alone. The Panama canal has to have locks because of the ocean differences, but no way would you have locks spanning a few hundred miles across. This thing would have tides back and forth.
Panama canal has to have locks because of the ocean differences
It's actually mostly due to the landscape of Panama, including the lake it uses to traverse and the mountains. The Pacific and Atlantic oceans don't different that much, maybe a few feet. And mostly due to tidal differences.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Plus literally chopping down a large stretch of both the Appalachians and the Sierra Nevada would be insane.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Assuming the river would be identical in depth and breadth to the Panama canal, if every man, woman, and child in the US picked up a shovel they would need to move 305 cubic feet of dirt each. So if we all just moved 1 cubic foot of dirt per day, we could pull this off in a year.
load more comments
(4 replies)
it could solve the water crisiseses
Dude all you need is 4 square meters and 2 water buckets
load more comments
(4 replies)
Do it small scale first and turn Florida into an island.
I feel like there has to be an easier way to solve the homeless problem in San Francisco.
This will require more bridges, which creates more jobs. It's genius!
In which direction would it flow?
From the center to the borders, due to rain.
I wouldn't be so certain about that. Evaporation might be stronger similar to the mediterreanian sea. So water would flow from both sides into the channel.
But such a project probably disturbes weather patterns and ocean currents all together. Hence, I don't think we can be curtain until we've tried it. Now grab your shovel. FOR SCIENCE!
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't trust anyone South of the Mistersippi river.
A lot of the canals in the world (the majority I think, but please fact check that) were built in the 19th century. So yeah... with shovels.
With the low resolution I can't quite tell if I would suddenly live on the beach or underwater
I would need a study on if this would negatively impact desert ecosystems or introduce invasive species, but otherwise it sounds pretty cool if we limit the size until it's about as big as the new Panama Canal expansions.
Nevermind any communities you'd separate or destroy by dropping a big ol' river through the middle of them
Americans don't mind building highways, so it is not a concern to them.
load more comments
(23 replies)
Most cost-effective would be to use the Photoshop eraser tool.
view more: next ›