this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
52 points (87.1% liked)

Programming.dev Meta

2466 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!

This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.

Links

Credits

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe
Ategon
52
Are We going to defederate from Threads (self.meta)
submitted 1 year ago by choroalp to c/meta
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

From what i see programming.dev still did not decided our stance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RandomDevOpsDude 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I look towards the experts to try and form my opinion here, as I am not one.

Our stance: We have been advocating for interoperability between platforms for years. The biggest hurdle to users switching platforms when those platforms become exploitative is the lock-in of the social graph, the fact that switching platforms means abandoning everyone you know and who knows you. The fact that large platforms are adopting ActivityPub is not only validation of the movement towards decentralized social media, but a path forward for people locked into these platforms to switch to better providers. Which in turn, puts pressure on such platforms to provide better, less exploitative services. This is a clear victory for our cause, hopefully one of many to come.

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/

I see that full blog as a "threads is good for the fediverse". I only look at and interact with local on this instance, but am generically against jumping to defederation because "no like".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should be pointed out that the author of this article had a private meeting with Meta regarding Threads and signed a NDA. He is also the head of a company that receives funding based on the popularity of the Mastodon software. There may or may not be deals we don't know about, but he is certainly not an unbiased party.

Meta's business is monitoring and using online social networks to manipulate human behavior. Their massive userbase will cause Threads content and users to dominate instances that federate with them. It's more than just "no like".

[–] RandomDevOpsDude 6 points 1 year ago

I did not know this, thank you for sharing. I am going to leave the comment because it has generated some good discourse (and hopefully maybe more) and in my reality, I don't think I would even notice if this instance chooses defederation.

[–] ICastFist 11 points 1 year ago

I am completely in favor of defederating from Threads. My personal bias against Zuck and his monsters aside, there's the very real chance that he'll use ActivityPub as free content for his own product's growth, slowly adding changes to the protocol until the "best experience" is only via threads

There is precedent in the form of Google and XMPP. In another thread, someone argued in favor of Meta and replied to that what happened was simply "Google outcompeted XMPP by offering a better user experience", not realizing that his argument was actually evidence against Meta. Google beat the competition. Thinking Meta will work to beat the competition (ActivityPub) is plausible.

Remember when Facebook wanted to buy Snapchat, but Snap refused? Facebook then added the stories feature to FB, Insta and Whatsapp (the latter 2 apps bought in order to further consolidate its power), in order to bleed Snapchat's userbase.

We can't predict the future, but Facebook Meta's past actions all point to a very likely chain of actions (Embrace, extend and extinguish).