this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)
rpg
3147 readers
11 users here now
This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs
Rules (wip):
- Do not distribute pirate content
- Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
- Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
- Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
- Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
- Do not advertise for livestreams
- Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
- Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
- No Zak S content.
- Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've found that the least inspiring behaviors of players, from my perspective as a DM, are when they hack and slash in combat. Whether it's built into the system, or you brew it on, giving players free skill checks alongside (rather than instead of) their normal combat turns can make things significantly more engaging and rewarding (for both them and the DM).
More generally, players should have multiple things they can do and the optimal one shouldn't consistently be the same thing.
Tangent: It's kind of a peeve of mine when like part of the group is doing standard RAW D&D move 30' and attack, and part of the group is doing like "can i make an acrobatics check to run on the wall, then athletics to jump next to the orc, and a perception check so i know which of his hands is likely to be dominant, and then stab him in that hand???"
I'm usually in the first group, and I'm annoyed that Bob is over there spending thrice as long. Just say you cast firebolt and let's keep this going, bob. If you want to play a game that has rules for engaging with the scene, I'd love to play Fate. I'd even try Exalted.
The worst thing is Bob doesn't know he wants to play something other than D&D.
I sincerely do not know how you people can meadure space and time in your games. Like what the fuck is 30 feet? What are 6 seconds really? it sounds lile a shit quantity, but is it enough to flourish something? How long is 30 feet? Do I really need measurements and rulers or squaremaps to have fun? Especially as a non american, it baffles me
I keep this page book marked because it has convenient photos for how far away things are: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/zones/thousand_feet.html
The content is worth reading, too.
@h3rm17 @jjjalljs 30 feet is about 9 meters, if that's any help. But given that you're also asking how long 6 seconds is when that's the same regardless of country, I'm assuming not?
Problem with visualizong time and measures, I think, more than that. Like I know what 6 seconds is, but what is really enough for? How useful are 6 seconds? 1 minute? Same with distance, how far it feels to do what?
@h3rm17 only use those bits if they make sense to you and your group, otherwise just guess. So many indie games nowadays have a variation on abstracted relative distances to explain how long it takes you to get somewhere or how hard a target is to hit, like hand/close/near/far
Will try this as well! Maybe move to abstract units will be better for us