this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
278 points (98.9% liked)

Programming

17668 readers
151 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's relatively easy to trust the result.

.. just as easy as taking the responsibility for it if it fails?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Do human programmers not fail?

I don't want to hype AI, but you're basically comparing a high school graduate AI (lots of general knowledge, no specialization) with a perfect senior dev. But that's not really fair.

As soon as an AI works better than the average developer in a given area, it will outperform them. Simple as that.

Of course it will make errors, but the question is, are the extra errors compared to a human worth the savings?

Just a quick example: let's say you'd need 10 devs of 100k a year and they produce errors worth 200k a year. That means costs of 1.2million a years.

If an AI costs 100k in licenses, replaces 5 devs and only adds, say 200k in errors, you're still at only 1 million a year.