Programming

17667 readers

260 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe

Ategon

[email protected]

[Solved] Is “multiplex” a proper name for bit concatenation? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/programming

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don’t remember the first time I saw this word but I suspect the word multiplex is not the proper one. How would you name this:

Shot name is multiplexed as 15:17, where:
* The first 15 bits stores the sequence number.
* The last 17 bits stores the shot number.

Thanks in advance!

EDIT: Thanks all! So it seems packed is the proper word. With pack/unpack being the name of the process.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd use 'encoded as 15:17', or 'packed' is fine here as well.

I'd also recommend being explicit about which 15 and 17 bits are used rather than using 'first' and 'last', because that may mean different things depending on the platform endianness. You could say 'Bits 0:14 store the sequence number, while bits 15:31 store the shot number'. That makes it far easier to reason about how to access each piece of data in the combined 32 bits.