Programming

17484 readers

175 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe

Ategon

[email protected]

"Useless syntax sugar": Numbered block parameters in Ruby (zverok.space)

submitted 1 year ago by PythOnRails to c/programming

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To each their own. But man imagine if you have a collection of stuff that has a large name, and then having to figure out a short name other than e when iterating. I hope you're not iterating over chemical names 😬

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

No need to be over-descriptive. Anything at all more specific than e will probably be a better name

[–] Kalabasa 1 points 1 year ago

It's not black and white. I mean, even el is a lot better than e.