this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
95 points (81.0% liked)
Asklemmy
44148 readers
1400 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is heavier, but it's a minor inconvenience. The heavier models run about 6 lbs. That's certainly more than other laptops, but that is not an amount that is difficult to carry, just less than ideal.
I keep my work laptop in a backpack when I'm hauling it places. It's not a heavy laptop, but the 20 lbs of other tools and miscellaneous items I also carry bump the total weight up. It's not that big of a deal, and I highly doubt she has many accessories, so she probably isn't lugging much more weight. It's probably lighter than an old briefcase full of papers.
I feel like if I was a lawyer, I would definitely want like the the most specced-out Macbook Air or Pro. The prosecutors/gov lawywrs prolly have to deal with whatever the government issues but you'd think on the defense side they'd be a bit more predictable in terms of wanting the lightest/most powerful (not looking to get in a Windows/Mac/Linux pissing match here) but having a balance between the two.
Eh. It's a powerful machine. I personally would never want Mac, so I'm not going to assume she would either. The weight and optics are the only real difference between this and a beefy HP or Dell, neither are necessarily deal breakers. I rather like the small break in monotony by seeing a typically gaming laptop used in the court room.
Don't get me wrong, I like stuff like this. This is not a critique or trying to turn it into a political thing. Its simply unusual from all the trials I've watched. For lack of a better word, I find the whole thing "neat"
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
I ran out of popcorn so I decided to ask, why are you guys so intently arguing with OP? He's either a moron or a troll
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
I have used the top of the line MacBook Pro (work provided) for ~8 years. They're great laptops. They can handle any programming compilation workload I can throw at it, even on top of all of IT's required malware. The OS is stable and stays out of my way for the most part. I don't use any Apple software and generally dislike when I have to do anything Apple-specific, but the hardware and runtime environment are undeniably solid.
That said, I'll probably never own a Mac because they're unreasonably expensive. I can get a high end gaming laptop or build a ludicrous desktop for the same price and run either linux or windows.
She can get some paralegal to lug that thing around
It's also got a pretty big screen, which the trend is slowly moving away from, but is something that's nice to have. These days people favor portability over size and power. I think if the thing wasn't lit up it would go unnoticed.
The big screen could definitely be helpful if multiple people at the table are looking at it during the proceedings
Well, maybe with your weak, sick Victorian shut in arms it would be quite a task to lug it around
My Victorian arms prefer to work smart rather than virtuously or whatever the fuck angle you're obliquely coming at this from