this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
95 points (81.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44148 readers
1400 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First of all, this is not criticising or taking a cheap shot or really political at all. I am fascinated that a lawyer uses/brings a gaming laptop to trial and I can't help but think it was contrived as another distraction.

What do y'all think? BTW, how expensive are they generally?

You think she plays League?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is heavier, but it's a minor inconvenience. The heavier models run about 6 lbs. That's certainly more than other laptops, but that is not an amount that is difficult to carry, just less than ideal.

I keep my work laptop in a backpack when I'm hauling it places. It's not a heavy laptop, but the 20 lbs of other tools and miscellaneous items I also carry bump the total weight up. It's not that big of a deal, and I highly doubt she has many accessories, so she probably isn't lugging much more weight. It's probably lighter than an old briefcase full of papers.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I feel like if I was a lawyer, I would definitely want like the the most specced-out Macbook Air or Pro. The prosecutors/gov lawywrs prolly have to deal with whatever the government issues but you'd think on the defense side they'd be a bit more predictable in terms of wanting the lightest/most powerful (not looking to get in a Windows/Mac/Linux pissing match here) but having a balance between the two.

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I ran out of popcorn so I decided to ask, why are you guys so intently arguing with OP? He's either a moron or a troll

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh. It's a powerful machine. I personally would never want Mac, so I'm not going to assume she would either. The weight and optics are the only real difference between this and a beefy HP or Dell, neither are necessarily deal breakers. I rather like the small break in monotony by seeing a typically gaming laptop used in the court room.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Don't get me wrong, I like stuff like this. This is not a critique or trying to turn it into a political thing. Its simply unusual from all the trials I've watched. For lack of a better word, I find the whole thing "neat"

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I have used the top of the line MacBook Pro (work provided) for ~8 years. They're great laptops. They can handle any programming compilation workload I can throw at it, even on top of all of IT's required malware. The OS is stable and stays out of my way for the most part. I don't use any Apple software and generally dislike when I have to do anything Apple-specific, but the hardware and runtime environment are undeniably solid.

That said, I'll probably never own a Mac because they're unreasonably expensive. I can get a high end gaming laptop or build a ludicrous desktop for the same price and run either linux or windows.