Programming

17509 readers

6 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe

Ategon

[email protected]

Are we ready for javascript without a build step on the front end in 2023? (lemmy.fbmac.net)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/programming

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On the current typescript / anti-typescript internet drama I saw someone mention javascript without a build step.

Do you think we're already there?

Last time I attempted it:

there were too many libraries I couldn't import
JSX (using babel) had a warning saying you shouldn't do it in the browser for production
there was some advice against not using a bundler, because several requests for different .js files is slower and bigger than a bundled package

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aloso 4 points 1 year ago

            
              Svelte/Vue/React components need to be compiled
JavaScript should be minified if the project has a significant size
File names should have a content hash, so they can be cashed in the browser
Even with HTTP/2, there's still a case to be made for bundling hundreds or thousands of JS modules into a single file for better performance
Bundlers give you a dev server with live reload and hot module replacement for great developer experience
Setting up Vite is really easy and requires minimal configuration (compared to Webpack, for example)