this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
406 points (97.9% liked)
Programming
20289 readers
577 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everything from this
to this
Is a convention based code generation. It's older than my tenure, so it's older than 15 years. Having convention-based code generation is something that you do as a part of DRY rule, so somewhere after you've noticed that you've done it three times. The real boom for it was when the current hype that was supposed to get rid of programming jobs were no-code/low-code solutions.
This is either reusable code composition or again convention based code generation.
This is DRY. Create once
sortBy(x=> x.name)
and then import it whenever you need it.Fair. POC is the only part where I could maybe see some gain in my use cases.
Be cautious about this approach though. Usually just playing with the thing will make you a beginner with it, so usually it's a good approach to read the documentation/manual and see where the bodies are buried.
First class grifter, respect.
To me that's a sign of a bad teacher. He might be a very good engineer, but not being able to tailor your responses to your junior - to me shows a lack of leadership skills.
Bejesus, man, I'm not stupid, don't feed me slop. I care about you, not about the translator dumbing you down to be a palatable to mediocre people.
Painkillers have kicked in now, but I really do want to continue this discussion so I’ll make this as unread and respond tomorrow when I can give your reply the time it deserves and I can be somewhat coherent.
I do apologise for the LLM version, it was in no way because I think you’re stupid and more because I know I have a tendency to digress and in the past that hasn’t been received well so my intention was to have something where the writing style isn’t going to turn people off from the thoughts I’m trying to convey.
Have a nice evening and I’ll hit you with a reply tomorrow. 😊.