this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)
Opensource
2605 readers
320 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It appears to have all of the downsides of a centralized payment processor (like PayPal, Visa, etc.) and also all of the downsides of a crypto-currency. I would avoid this clusterfuck like the plague.
Because it's not a crypto-currency it is a lot more efficient: e.g. no need for wasteful proof-of-work or staking. So it certainly does not have all the downsides of crypto.
Honestly I don't need to know anything about it at all except that it's a payment system designed by GNU to know that it stands zero chance of success.
GNU are uber-geeks that do not comprehend usability at all. They think everyone is happy to go to key exchange parties and run their own servers and so on. There's absolutely no chance this is understandable by normal people.
Then you seem to know even less then you thought? GNU supports development, but each project is independently designed and developed. Taler's roots are in academia.
Well, as usual with GNU, there is the chance that someone else will take it and make it useful. They usually have a solid foundation, they're just kinda stuck in the middle ages when it comes to usability.