this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
1317 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

61081 readers
2562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tyler 29 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Programming.dev does this and is the tenth largest instance.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Techy people are a lot more likely to jump through a couple of hoops for something better, compared to your average Joe who isn't even aware of the problem

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Techy people are a lot more likely to jump through hoops because that knowledge/experience makes it easier for them, they understand it's worthwhile or because it's fun. If software can be made easier for non-techy people and there's no downsides then of course that aught to be done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Yeah that was kinda my point

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ok, now tell the linux people this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's not always obvious or easy to make what non-techies will find easy. Changes could unintentionally make the experience worse for long-time users.

I know people don't want to hear it but can we expect non-techies to meet techies half way by leveling their tech skill tree a bit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I know people don’t want to hear it but can we expect non-techies to meet techies half way by leveling their tech skill tree?

In order to charge her iphone, my mom first turns on airplane mode, and THEN she powers it down. Turns it off completely. I asked why she does any of that. She says "Because they won't flip the charge switch for me until they do! I wish I could take the battery out first, and THEN turn off the phone. But I suppose if they can't see my battery with airplane mode on first, this is just as good."

And you want this woman to learn terminal?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Learning is difficult but I have to believe it is still part of the solution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Why would she ever need to use a terminal?

I imagine she'd be doing normal computer stuff, not writing bash scripts.

[–] tyler 1 points 4 days ago

It’s de facto required if she switches to Linux and ever has an issue. The conversation here started with Linux.

[–] TheFogan 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

10th largest instance being like 10k users... we're talking about the need for a solution to help pull the literal billions of users from mainstream social media

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

There isn't a solution. People don't want to pay for something that costs huge resources. So their attention becoming the product that's sold is inevitable. They also want to doomscroll slop; it's mindless and mildly entertaining. The same way tabloid newspapers were massively popular before the internet and gossip mags exist despite being utter horseshite. It's what people want. Truly fighting it would requires huge benevolent resources, a group willing to finance a manipulative and compelling experience and then not exploit it for ad dollars, push educational things instead or something. Facebook, twitter etc are enshitified but they still cost huge amounts to run. And for all their faults at least they're a single point where illegal material can be tackled. There isn't a proper corollary for this in decentralised solutions once things scale up. It's better that free, decentralised services stay small so they can stay under the radar of bots and bad actors. When things do get bigger then gated communities probably are the way to go. Perhaps until there's a social media not-for-profit that's trusted to manage identity, that people don't mind contributing costs to. But that's a huge undertaking. One day hopefully...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We have a human vetted application process too and that's why there's rarely any bots or spam accounts originating from our instance. I imagine it's a similar situation for programming.dev. It's just not worth the tradeoff to have completely open signups imo. The last thing lemmy needs is a massive influx of Meta users from threads, facebook or instagram, or from shitter. Slow, organic growth is completely fine when you don't have shareholders and investors to answer to.

[–] tyler 1 points 4 days ago

Yep, completely agree.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The bar is not particularly high with lemmy and that is a focused community.

People aren't (generally) being made aware of the injustice on the other side of the planet while they are asking a question about C#.

[–] Zink 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah but people ARE (generally) being made aware about Linux while they are asking a question about the injustice on the other side of the planet. You're welcome Lemmy!

/s, also I do not officially represent the instance in any capacity, lol