this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
146 points (98.7% liked)

Opensource

1314 readers
19 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

You hope the idea that "commerical companies that have profited off of FOSS feel compelled and pledge to contribute to the maintainence and development of those projects" doesn't catch on?

Why?

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think he meant the idea of shaming companies for not donating to things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

It will probably not be a surprise to you, but I don't see a problem with shaming companies either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, kinda funny that I further the idea of open being fully open, and get downvoted. In an open source community. Funny.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Open is open, should have as few strings attached as possible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

And tolerant people should be tolerant, except when met with intolerance. If people are leveraging other people's good will both selfishly and expansively, why should you let them continue to do it?

This stifles the project in no way, the small individuals that use it will still use be able to use it.