this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
1123 points (99.1% liked)

News

23014 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

edit: I have changed my title to match the new NYTimes headline. Sorry about the all caps, I guess they are really excited about this lol

Also shoutout to @[email protected] who shared a gift article link in the comments. I hope you don't mind but I kinda stole it and updated the post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

Do you guys think this matters to his voters/supporters?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (3 children)

This is going to give a lot of GOP Senators a fig leaf.

If someone puts a motion in Congress to make it illegal for him to run, a lot of them will vote for it.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I absolutely do not want a ban on felons running for President. In some countries, that is used as a political tool to eliminate political opponents. Putin used that against Navalny.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42479909

Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny has been formally barred from competing in next year's presidential election.

The Central Electoral Commission has said Mr Navalny was ineligible because of a corruption conviction which he says is politically motivated.

He has urged his supporters to boycott the March vote.

Mr Navalny, 41, was widely regarded as the only candidate with a chance of challenging President Vladimir Putin.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not to mention, Trump won't even be the first person in the USA who could be running for president from jail.

edit: the first from a major party though, sorry Debs

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

His felonies are related to campaing financing, which could be used to narrow down without banning all felons. While I oppose anyone losing the right to vote, I don't oppose people who are connvicted of treason, insurrection, or felonies related to campaign finance or abuse of elected positions being banned since they have been proven to have undermined democracy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

I get allowing former felons to run for office - they served time that society said was their punishment. They are done with it.

But a law that bans a felon that has not completed their punishment is a different story.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

All the more reason for the Republicans to support it, TBH.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We've banned them from voting for decades.

Also, the USA isn't Russia and Biden isn't Putin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Not running, though. Much harder to use that to eliminate a political opponent.

Also, the USA isn't Russia

No. But I'd also like to keep it that way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Then keep Donald out.

This was not the first time Trump has had a run in with the law. When he was building Trump Tower he employed Polish immigrants and treated them so badly that they won a million dollar settlement against him

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-undocumented-polish-workers-tower-paid-settlement-millions-bonwit-teller-building-new-york-a8080336.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

bad law. I'd much rather a law where the candidate has to describe the nature of their past convictions in a written statement submitted with their filing paperwork to run and explain why each one doesn't affect their ability to run the country.

Aka reflecting on one's crimes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Except assholes like trump see themselves as victims of a witch-hunt and he would write that out , sorry: he will have a lawyer write that out for every one of them. I doubt he has the attention span for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

How do you propose such a bill be advanced through the GOP controlled house?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It'll probably be good for his campaign somehow

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He'll be able to work some sort of grift off of it for sure but I feel like this definitely gives some Republicans an "out."

Now they just have to take it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

They didn’t take Jan 6

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

It gives us something new to troll those miserable asshats over. "Interesting argument, but have you considered the fact that your candidate is a convicted felon?"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Before all this started, people did make claims that they wouldn't vote for him if he was convicted.

But then they also said they wouldn't vote for him even if Nikki Haley conceded.

So we'll see, I guess. But I'm not optimistic.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Some, but they'll never tell the others.

Ladies you don't have to tell your husband you voted for Biden.

[–] riskable 6 points 6 months ago

Yes: To them this demonstrates that the justice system is corrupt and they think only Trump can fix it.

They will believe this even though Trump isn't running for any office in New York 🤣

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Tucker Carlson responded to today’s verdict in what can only be described as an apocalyptic tone, stating on X that the jury’s decision marked “the end of the fairest justice system in the world.” The former Fox News host said that Trump would still win the election “if he’s not killed first,” and closed by saying that “anyone who defends this verdict is a danger to you and your family.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

It will most matter for undecided voters who required a guilty verdict to decide, althoigh I'm not sure that is a large number in swing states.

It won't matter for his base that already ignore reality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It's reductive to think of his supporters as a single bloq.

It will certainly matter to at least some of them.