yetAnotherUser

I don't recommend doing your laundry with a fucking machine, but you do you.

Does that make it legal in your country?

There's no way companies should be able to abuse these technicalities. Don't you have teleological interpretations of laws - meaning laws being interpreted by considering the intent behind them?

You're right in some regard though I still believe taking note of trends is important, don't you? If most pre-record civilizations we find have behaved and lived in a certain way it could tell us something notable about our past.

That's what I thought too, but wouldn't it be mentioned somewhere in the article? Like a line saying:

"The city government plans to demolish the bridge due to risk of collapse."

But why though?

Blind serbian nationalism would be my guess but there seems to be more. Why now and why dismantle a working bridge without replacement?

L

Hey baby... wanna watch Jellyfin and dismantle the patriarchy?

For me 10 people are usually in line :(

Although it still doesn't take longer than like 15 minutes

But that would be worse?

The solution to women being treated unfairly is not to start treating men unfairly too. It's to treat women fairly.

What if we alter the scenario slightly?

The homeless man ran "aggressively" through the checkouts (without paying for the water bottle of course) and the police "believed" he had a knife to force his way through. Water bottles sure look like knifes sometimes after all.

I'm fairly certain the homeless man would be charged with felony murder if the police shot bystanders (and the homeless man survived).

No, because it isn't proportional.

A homeless man stealing a bottle of water with a security guard shooting up half the store due to bad aim as a result should not be charged for murder.

Besides, murder should always require intent to kill. Robbery - including armed robbery - does not usually imply this.

Couldn't you tell? It's clearly a furry cat.