sukhmel

joined 2 years ago
[–] sukhmel 6 points 3 months ago

That's maybe the most helpful argument I read here, I think I should reconsider what neopronouns are about.

[–] sukhmel 6 points 3 months ago

I think at that point one can choose to word sentences to not use pronouns at all

[–] sukhmel 2 points 3 months ago

::: spoiler live action Sonic possibly AI generated photo of a hedgehog with a ring floating near it or a photo of a hedgehog sleeping on a hand with a wedding ring on said hand

[–] sukhmel 4 points 3 months ago

Looks satisfying

[–] sukhmel 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon

[–] sukhmel 4 points 3 months ago

That'd probably change the world forever. Besides, it would likely be hunted by all the people who want to destroy it.

[–] sukhmel 3 points 3 months ago

This, we need more samples (but please don't)

[–] sukhmel 2 points 3 months ago

I feel like you're considering death penalty to be the default, but if the same logic is applied while considering lifetime in prison as the default, the result would be the opposite.

And considering that death of age looks to me more natural, I'm inclined to think no death penalty should be the default

[–] sukhmel 1 points 3 months ago

Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] sukhmel 1 points 3 months ago

A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?

As per current psychology's view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo

[–] sukhmel 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'd say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it's not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it's language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we're wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it's just language all the way down.

Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn't keep my hopes up

[–] sukhmel 1 points 3 months ago

Nah, it's just a legacy of British colonialism, it's forbidden by the state to harm yourself in UK (half joking, because it really is a crime to harm yourself consensually)

view more: ‹ prev next ›