secundnature

What a misleading article. It feels like they had to try as hard as possible to make it seem like A both sides issues, but their one example of a democrat doing this is Robert reich writing an article for the guardian saying Elon musk should be jailed. Neither of which are running for political office.

To me it seems like there is something they’re scared of, otherwise they’d just let the courts handle it instead passing legislation to retroactively try and get the entire lawsuit thrown out. 🤷‍♂️

That’s pretty weird.

I believe they prefer to go by Lois Einhorn now.

We need to be passing consumer protection legislation to make companies stop doing things like this. Just "calling on them" to end the process isn't going to do anything to fix the problem. Companies have no incentive to do the right thing for their customers. The only thing they care about is short term profit.

I still need chips to do that. But even with chips on the sandwich, i'd need them on the side also. Otherwise, I'm still just eating a sandwich and for some reason it makes me uncomfortable and likely to stop eating after just a few bites.

What an absurd burden to put on someone. If I can opt in electronically, I should be able to opt out electronically.

I can't eat a sandwich if I don't have chips with it.

The richest one percent spending their money to keep everyone else poor. I'm shocked, shocked i tell you. Well, not that shocked, maybe just hungry? Eat the rich.

"A man wanted just two slices of cheese on his sandwich, so when his wife used three slices in his grilled cheese sandwich, he became irate."

Another stable genius, folks /s

Have those shoes been dipped in gold!?

There aren’t laws saying the company had to tell the truth, so if they lie, what’s the punishment?

Edit: also, wouldn’t the power to punish them have to come from some sort of law or regulation? 🤔