robinn2

How many essays have your written? How many sources have you combed through? How many times have you explained the most basic facts of reality? How many attempts at good faith? Only for them to dismiss it in their stupidity. They don't read it, they just crumble and divert back to the programming these little shits trust in more than God.

I relate to this so much. The number of well-cited responses and long explanations I've posted and not a single person going "sorry, I'm wrong" or even engaging with the sources provided in a meaningful way. I used to be pro-full federation, but genuinely I think shitjustworks has been the final straw. These are some of the most ignorant people we've been forced to deal with since opening up. Absolutely keep Lemmygrad, then shitjustworks needs to go first and foremost (not the least of which for the fact that they endorse blatant racism) and SJW, and then we need to reassess how federation was carried out (Chapo.chat might be a good alternative as @[email protected] said).

Ugh horrible argument. No, you have to contend with the source I provided, not skip it and provide a different source, especially when the prolewiki page is a challenge to the Wikipedia page, and so citing the latter is like citing a work against which a polemic is directed at the polemic as an "alternative."

Apparently Wikipedia is "not biased", they just forbid certain sources, include U.S. government aligned sources by and large (this article you've cited sources Radio Free Europe, a CIA propaganda outlet; the New York Times summaries of situations in countries the U.S. is opposed to (this is done 10x), despite the source being a rubber stamp for the U.S. government; a Washington Post opinion article which completely obfuscates the nature of the press as a tool of class rule), and so on. Sorry, Wikipedia is biased.

"Horrible people exist" is the claim now? I thought they were "heroic defenders against an aggressor?" No mention of how I turned your "he's Jewish" defense on its head, no mention of how Zelensky wears and advertises Nazi merchandise, no mention of how these horrible people who simply "exist" are propped up by Zelensky and the government (no, all I showed was that "horrible people exist"). No mention of how these Nazis are CURRENTLY harming minorities in Ukraine, "let's just worry about that after" no I don't think so. I fucking hate Nazis, and I am not waiting for ANYTHING to challenge the government being soft on them (supporting them, advertising them, praising them) and allowing them to commit atrocities against their own population. Fuck you for supporting this, and in a just world you would be shot.

Praising nazis. For... shuffles cards defending the country against an agressor?

1. You forgot the picture (I know of Utkin though, maybe don't do w h a t a b o u t i s m, especially when I never said I supported Russia, and this is the only person you're able to point to whereas in Ukraine Nazis are everywhere [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], you're being dishonest in order to shuffles cards discard criticism of the prevalence of Nazism in Ukraine)
2. If you need the support of Nazis for your struggle perhaps you need to reconsider what you're doing (if they're such a "small part" of the struggle as well, as people claim, then surely Zelensky doesn't need to resort to such sycophancy and can jail these people). Zelensky wears and advertises Nazi merchandise [1] [2]; does photoshoots with Nazis (that's Azov's Andriy Biletsky, who previously stated that his goal is to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade… against Semite-led Untermenschen” ); Ukraine is known for connections to the far right, to the extent that U.S. Congress removed a ban on funding Neo-Nazis in order to support Ukraine.

You can't just hand wave this away as "Zelensky is Jewish"; in fact, Right Sektor antisemite Dmitro Korchynsky said it's convenient that the president is Jewish, because it means that it is harder to accuse Ukraine of nazism. You're playing right into the hands of people who are actively harming and seeking to kill minorities] and who uphold Nazi collaborators as heroes. You are a horrible person.

Zelensky also does photo shoots with and praises Nazis

I understand this to be an official endorsement of racism from the mod team at shitjustworks

The image literally colors his skin yellow, this is some of the most obvious racism/colorism I've seen and yet these complete brainless children become willfully ignorant and "don't see the problem." Yes, the mods officially endorse racism and sinophobia, and I would like to put on the record that I voted against federating with shitjustworks. What has been the result? They come into our threads with their nonsense opinions and get instantly obliterated, we come into theirs and get banned. Fuck shitjustworks, on our own turf they need would a million posters to rival the power of a single one of ours.

Also these fucking chauvinist dipshits who are calling Xi a dictator know absolutely nothing about the democratic process in the PRC. And someone's seriously claiming that depictions of Winnie the Pooh were outlawed lmao? So easy to disprove.

It is their fault. They lost an argument only to whine about me and others in another thread (after willfully ignoring my response to their points) and now they say they "don't have a lot of time" (they had time to write 400 responses and link multiple resources they didn't verify) when asked to read, that's textbook bad faith cowardice. This person you're responding to, JohnDclay, is the asshole lib from the 500 response thread.

I'm trying to talk in good faith, but I don't have 10 hours to read about it. I've only researched about 1 or 2 hours. But I'm definitely not just taking your website at face value.

Right, so you didn't read my carrd and then linked a different source instead (super good faith) that I completely refuted (apparently you felt no need to respond to my complete rebuttal]. So you didn't read the comment or the response to your rebuttal, and yet you're saying you're acting in good faith because you don't have a lot of time/haven't done a lot of research? Whatever, then don't act like you're qualified to have an opinion.

But I'm definitely not just taking your website at face value.

What does this even mean? "Face value"? It's a collection of sources. Seriously, if you don't have the knowledge to even respond to my points, much less my complete refutation of your own points, don't ghost respond to me acting like I've said something crazy to get support in another thread. It's cowardly and pathetic.

I'm just so fed up with folks online regarding, what i would call state capitalist countries as genuine socialism,

Read up on your Trotsky fool

https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Authoritarianism

I will have you shot

I thought it was Warren Buffett and got excited lmao