robinn2

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I agree, face the wall

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In any event, the US didn't need an excuse to join the war. Germany was giving us plenty already.

When the US declared war on Japan in response to the attack on Pearl Harbor, it did not declare war on Germany; Germany declared war on the US three days after the US declared war on Japan. The U.S. was the ideological predecessor to Nazism [1] [2], and only joined the war when they were threatened.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Uphold the Communist Party of China and Marxism-Leninism-MZT; Amerikkka inspired Nazism and will, like its child, die in a bunker with a gun to its head

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Read up on colorism

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're the type of socialism (social democracy) that I approve of.

Social democracy is not socialism, it is social-fascism, class collaboration leeching off the wealth of the global south like a settler vampire from the hill of the imperialism. Look at how social democratic settlers treat immigrants, or minorities/natives. You fundamentally do not understand what socialism is.

And no offense, but you have no fucking idea what the the PRC is doing. You know nothing about their government structure, how policy is carried out, or the way the system functions at all. I guarantee you could not name the tiers of government, or even three government officials without looking it up. Your ignorance is shown right away by the fact that you say “CCP” (Chinese Communist Party) when the correct acronym is “CPC” (Communist Party of China). This is such a simple mistake that proves you have not read any media outside of the west regarding China.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Then you have some racist elements mixed in with the student protests I've heard, i.e. that there were some Chinese who were protesting because they didn't like the presence of African exchange students at their universities. I don't know how true that is, but I've heard it a few times

From Another View of Tiananmen:

Concerns over prices weren’t solely due to absolute levels of privation, however. The complaints were heavily tinged with elitism. Students and urbanites were not happy to see peasants and farmers do so well relative to them. This “economic anxiety” had manifested itself a year earlier in Nanjing, where students affected by cuts to tuition subsidies took out their anger on African exchange students. “From December 1988 to January 1989, students in Nanjing, China waged violent protests against visiting African students.” The writing on the placards was very revealing:

Like most foreign students, the Africans enjoyed greater standards of living in China and some dated local women. Among the signs in the crowd at Hehai on Christmas Eve 1988 were placards demanding greater democracy alongside ones proclaiming, “death to the black devils”.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Shut up racist

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Nazi instance

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Shut up racist

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

No that’s uh because uh

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

We cannot be blocked, we are the tide of history

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

bullying assholes is sort of what makes all this fun

It’s clearly not fun for a lot of people. And sometimes the dogpile just doesn’t form, or in the case of "DM harassment", which I haven't personally experienced but which other users complained about, cannot form. DM harassment also complicates the moderation issue + by selective federation, we've already acknowledged that some instances should not be engaged with/cannot be regulated, so I don’t think stricter moderation is the only solution. Plus remember the situation immediately after federation? The pro-federation crowd were quick to criticize any “dunk” post for fear that it could jeopardize our position and provoke defederation, so even this “bullying” is restricted by the situation.

I think I'd like to see that, before I see anything else happen.

I disagree, you can’t build on hollow ground. Stricter moderation is absolutely necessary, but first we need to reconsider what instances we’re federated with. It’s silly, but what comes to mind is China’s reform and opening up. Deng Xiaoping said, "If you open the window for fresh air, you have to expect some flies to blow in”, and suggested a “net” to counter this. The difference is that we have the freedom to close this window before putting up the net, because federation isn’t a necessity of the new era, it is a choice we made. Some people are in support of it, some people are opposed to it, and popular opinion is all that matters in this case. Before we put up the net, we need to decide how large we want the window to be, so that we don’t accidentally place a net where there should be a solid wall. From our new experience we should have a discussion about what we learned from federation and a vote about what to do with the situation, rather than wait to see what “stricter moderation” (how can this be enforced across all comms? By a greater number of mods most likely, which exposes a host of new issues) will do.

 

@[email protected], you are the only person who posts on this server, with zero engagement. No likes, no comments, nothing (keep in mind I’m sorting by “active” lmfao). You are posting complete nonsense to yourself, it’s pathetic. Edit: this post has more likes than any other one on this entire comm💀

  1. The profile image of your comm is racist, it colors Xi Jinping's skin to be yellow, a typical sinophobic stereotype. No we will not be taking the "it originated in China" excuse because it's nonsense (colorism exists; editing his skin yellow did not originate in China; also, this is used in a completely different spirit to the original post, and this edit is explicitly racist and indefensible). Also, and this is quite funny, the Communist Party of China (CPC) is often incorrectly referred to as the "Chinese Communist Party (CCP)"; if I had seen this from you, it would further demonstrate your complete ignorance, but instead you said "CPP" (Communist Party of the Philippines) (this is a whole new level of completely lacking knowledge on the subject) in your comm rules lmao. Jesus you have brainworms.

  2. I dare you, if you're not a coward or lying to yourself, to respond to this evidence against your post that itself “refutes” one of our posts by using zero sources (I know this is humiliating to see your beliefs torn apart, but don't get too offended):

Video of the square being cleared (not aired in the West, strange)

Hou Dejian, one of the leaders of the Tiananmen protests, saying he was in the square all night and saw no one killed; Also here's Chai Ling, another protest leader, saying in an interview that she wanted (and had planned for) all of the protestors to be massacred (and that she had tricked them) but that she was leaving the square:

"The students keep asking, “What should we do next? What can we accomplish?” I feel so sad, because how can I tell them that what we are actually hoping for is bloodshed, for the moment when the government has no choice but to brazenly butcher the people. Only when the Square is awash with blood will the people of China open their eyes. Only then will they really be united. But how can I explain any of this to my fellow students?

(Are you going to stay in the Square yourself?)

No, I won’t. Because my situation is different. My name is on the government’s hit list. I’m not going to let myself be destroyed by this government. I want to live."

Confidential cable from U.S. gov. embassy in Beijing showing US knew there was no firing in the square

“Tankman” Actual Footage - (are we expected to believe that a group of tanks which had just got done driving over a supposed 10,000 people would stop for one man and try to drive around him, which the man blocks, then let him get atop the tank, bang on it, and simply try to speak to him?)

There Was No "Tiananmen Square Massacre" - CBS News Correspondent*

*Constitutively and pathologically unable to simply own up to a past journalistic crime, the propaganda apparatus merely substitutes a new lie for the old one. There was no massacre in Tiananmen Square. It had been evacuated and the riot between protestors and PLA soldiers occurred in surrounding areas. The CBS testimony says that the CPC denies the casualties in outer areas. This is incorrect, the official death toll according to the Chinese government is, in fact, a matter of public record.

Student's account picked apart by NYT

Protestors Lynched PLA Soldiers, proving this was not a massacre but a clash (already proven outside square)

I will be posting this for everyone to see what a racist fraud you are, farewell. And don't bother deleting this or banning me, it will be saved and reposted. Besides, I thought you were against censorship lmao, that’s what you bragged about when we originally dunked on you.

view more: next ›