that is the only current accepted alternative to paying for website access, yes
if you have better ideas though, we'd all love to hear them
refalo
joined 7 months ago
very interesting. I'm sure someone will be along to tell me why I shouldn't care.
You might be right, but I don't think that's a problem they're going to solve all on their own, meanwhile the rest of users will suffer.
Yes! Are you saying this is kindof the same thing?
such a qol upgrade
I don't think you're wrong, but I do think that if everyone thought that, they would be doing it already.
I have routinely tried to get friends and family to use ad-blockers and they simply don't care enough to even attempt to download one.
can be combatted with a £5 Faraday bag
I don't consider that a reasonable solution for most people, and there are many posts claiming those almost never work well enough. You could also make the argument that it shouldn't be necessary in the first place.
That is about monitoring by your network
I don't think it matters to most people, as you are still tracked by having the phone physically with you, which is what people are against.
A ten year old article about Samsung phones
Are you suggesting Samsung phones should have ever been allowed to spy on people? Or that this doesn't highlight a bigger issue? I don't see why this should get a pass at all.
An exploit affecting lots of phones that seems like it was fixed
I think it's very much a real threat, and leaked docs show world governments and bad actors actively use such exploits routinely for years, including keeping previously unknown exploits a secret to use for themselves.
I understand your desire to turn talking points into nothingburgers but I feel like this is not only disingenuous but against the entire principal of security and privacy. Of course we all have our own individual threat models, but to dismiss another person's model because you think it shouldn't matter to anyone, doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
Why are you linking to the old video?
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcjkezf1ARY](NOTCURSES III: THE SAGA CONTINUES)
Probably not true, probably extremely dangerous to reveal even if it was.
Protip: Run a socks5h proxy server on the pi that does not use its own DNS resolver. Then FoxyProxy on your browser with the default being off/direct. Then whenever you need it, switch that one tab to use the proxy to bypass your blocking.
Cousin! Let's go bowling.
You're probably not wrong, I just have a really hard time wrapping my head around it. Personally I could not stand living with a person I hate to look at. Not that they can help it, and maybe that makes me shallow. It's not like I even want to be that way, but my brain just doesn't want to allow it.
I think eventually if a federated system (or particular server) gets too popular they will just defederate from everyone else and perpetuate the same problem all over again