Especially if you consider R2 as unreliable narrator that would explain his antics in Episode 1, 2 and 3.
plumbus
joined 1 year ago
Früher habe ich beim Zubettbringen gefragt was ihnen am Tag am besten und wenigsten gefallen hat. Da war eine schöne Reflektion.
Mittlerweile diskutieren sie aber lieber bis zu welcher Größe Turbolaser der Blast noch von einem Lichtschwert abgewehrt werden kann.
Sie sind 9, 6 und 3 und der kleinste hat noch keine Minute Star Wars gesehen, hört aber sehr aufmerksam zu.
Not really, if you’re in Barcelona.
Our accounts are the same age.
No, that would be your parents‘ task.
Yeah, I fully understand their benefit to make better use of renewable energy sources. But they are not net-generating power, so their inclusion in the graph is still somewhat misleading.
How are batteries generating electricity?
I‘m not questioning the data, but this whole „article“ is advertising to sell an ETF to invest into this trend.
I think the premise of a „pixel“ being the smallest entity in software is not right. Rasterization, i.e. translating (actually reducing) a defined subset of the software state into a 2D grid of colored pixels, is only a very limited view on that software.
This might be the reason for the different answers we‘re getting here. Most aim for subatomic physics, it we could also go to light theory (photons and wave frequencies/resolution) and human retinas, general optics and electron microscopes, which again would end up at subatomic physics (you got my circle-train of thought here).
It just follows the general ‚suggestion‘ of gravity in Star Wars. It can be switched on or off as needed. Even the smallest vessels do vertical takeoff without any visible thrusters and in space your feet are safely attached to the floor.
After watching and reading The Expanse that has become very apparent.