the 538 analysis showed he only decreased Clinton's margin of victory.
the supreme Court made the difference
there is no way to know what would have happened if he hadn't been in the race. you cannot prove a counterfactual.
do you also remember that the supreme Court stopped the vote counting and declared Bush the winner?
none of this proves her goal was to spoil the election.
Nader absolutely did spoil the 2000 election for Gore.
gore won that election.
Perot made it possible for Clinton to win over GHW Bush
this just isn't so. analysis of that election found that perot actually cut into clinton's margin of victory
you arguing against it marks you as a troll or an idiot.
i don't tolerate abuse. i'll accept your apology any time.
according to the post-election analysis, ross perot decreased the margin of victory for clinton, and nader never spoiled any elections.
if you cook all your food.