mke

joined 5 months ago
MODERATOR OF
zed
[–] mke 2 points 3 weeks ago

For what it's worth, the rest of the report is mostly fine, and I'm inclined to believe I learned something about Drew. But I also felt that was not honest, and question if it had to be included at all. Looking around, it seems the author likes Stallman, and regardless of how they felt before, they probably disliked Drew when they found he was connected to the Stallman report.

So thanks for mentioning that weird vibe. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who paused at that section.

[–] mke 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ironically, the writing felt weaker than Drew's, which led to unexpected feelings while reading. For example:

r/preteen_girls (why this was even allowed to exist is beyond our comprehension)

Emphasis mine. My immediate reaction was this shouldn't be beyond comprehension to anyone who looks into Reddit's history and culture. Silly, not even a nitpick proper—though I have one—but it got a snort from me.

Anyway, assuming provided information is correct, seems he:

  1. Likes sexual anime-like depictions of minors
  2. Is sloppy at compartmentalizing his internet activity (or didn't care to; why?)

I, uh, also wonder if one can get in trouble for hosting screenshots of certain content for a report. Guess it also depends on where they're hosting from. I hope they're fine, because from this report and the rest of their blog, they seem to enjoy internet slapfights.

[–] mke 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And I'm saying you're better off without. That sentence is ridiculous enough already, it doesn't need the source to make it worse. But good on you for worrying about credit, do as you will.

[–] mke 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

— vintermann, Hacker News

I don't know who this person is, but adding "Hacker News" doesn't give their words more credibility. It gives them less, if anything.

Imagine I quoted someone and, underneath it, added:

— PM_ME_UR_FEET, Reddit

Both of these enjoy the same level of base, intrinsic trust to me: none.

[–] mke 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not hoping for a miracle, but it'd be nice if some Japanese users followed him, even if only as a secondary account.

I believe Japan is the nation with the second most twitter users, so any chip at that foundation helps.

That, and I'd like to see more touhou artists venture beyond twitter.

P.S. couldn't find info wrt him and Mastodon, so nothing new, I guess.

[–] mke 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just for the record, I know little about gotosocial, but I've looked into Misskey a fair bit and I think it's irrelevant here.

FediDB data on active users seems off (a low ~12k MAU), but even if the real number is much greater, most are on the flagship instance (misskey.io) which has multiple CSAM censures on fediseer.

Put another way, it's almost counterproductive to include Misskey in these topics because simply federating with its biggest instance could be a liability for most 1st world western instances.

I doubt the Swiss government would get much out of Misskey.

[–] mke 1 points 1 month ago

I looked around, but was unable to find more about this. Until something new comes up, I'm assuming it's just a rumor.

[–] mke 1 points 1 month ago

Are you talking about Dorsey? Because if so, he left Bluesky as he didn't like their focus on moderation.

Not that it matters much, I sincerely doubt most users look up such details before joining anything. It's all about the experience.

[–] mke 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yet, Bluesky didn't even support video posts until two weeks ago. Many other highly requested features are still missing. To what extent does the success of each platform come down to money? What did Bluesky do with a larger budget to get an edge?

[–] mke 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's inaccurate and reductive. ATproto and ActivityPub do not federate the same way, and how they work greatly affects how users interact with the entire ecosystem.

On Mastodon, pick the wrong instance and there's content you'll never see, migration isn't complete, discovery is so bad they started a new initiative to try fixing it, instances have their own cultures, and so on.

Bluesky has issues, some I'd consider critical, but they're not directly user-facing for the most part. Make an account, you get the same experience as everyone else.

edit: Sorry, I have this issue where I try to be concise, yet feel like I end up being rude. I get your confusion, but they're quite different. Hopefully this helped; I can elaborate if you want.

[–] mke 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think one of the biggest reasons is that the Fediverse is often a pain to get into and sometimes a pain to use.

Bluesky and Threads "just work."

Some people say it's marketing and in Threads' case I can believe it, but I haven't seen any example of large marketing campaign by Bluesky.

[–] mke 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Unironically would probably incentivize me to exercise more often.

P.S. glad you're having fun and being healthy with Miku

view more: ‹ prev next ›