laylawashere44

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The crossing been bombed 3 times? There is literally video. The fact that Israel bombed the crossing is not in dispute anywhere. https://youtu.be/YlfzCy5752M?si=fa8y8bPB9n-4b-rO

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fr, Evergrande is dying because China recently cracked down on the over-leveraging and financial fuckery. If they wanted to save Evergrande, all they'd need to do is to give them a break on the new rules, but they aren't because they reckon it's worth it to punish Evergrande.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It cites the Egyptian foreign ministry and unnamed egyptian security sources. Why lie?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube shorts, no time for bs when you have 60s to do a recipe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Go where? The only companies that can afford to do unlimited video forever for everyone are the likes of Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. Meta tried to steal VOD watchers from YouTube years ago, they failed. Amazon tried to get into VOD via Twitch, they gave up. Microsoft tried to come after Twitch with Mixer, they failed. Moreover, a lot of the things we hate about youtube like poor content moderation, the copyright system, demonetization, etc arent youtubes fault. The broken copyright system is just a result of what copyright law is, it'd probably be worse on a different site since they wouldn't have the special agreement YouTube has with major copyright holders to serve as an intermediary. Instead of content strikes, or an ad revenue claim, that youtube has the special power to do, you'd just default to DMCA takedowns for everything immediately. And yeah content moderation and demonetization is bad but Youtube never wanted to do this right? They were happily showing ads on ISIS videos, its advertisers that forced them, which is how we ended up with a system that randomly pulls ads from videos if there is a hint of something an ad agency would object too. I mean it's either this or advertisers don't advertise at all, which fucks everyone, instead of a few people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Look this is different than pirating a game or bypassing a newspaper paywall. Watching content on YouTube simply costs money to YouTube. It's not like torrenting a game or movie, where while you haven't paid for the content, it didn't cost anything to the owner other than theoretical revenue. And it's not like bypassing a newspaper paywall, either, where the cost to the newspaper to serve you the story is practically negligible and the real costs are fixed and not related to how many people actually read the story.

Hosting video costs money and nobody can replace YouTube's massive library or realistically replicate their business model. I mean just look at image/gif hosting sites, they constantly go bust like Photobucket because storing everyone's pictures forever and for free isn't not a real business model.

YouTube needs to be paid for its gonna go the way of Photobucket.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah this is not really data that affects privacy. Literally none of it can be used for advertising and half of it is literally required for it so the basic functions of an online game and the rest is catch cheaters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly if you must have a chromium browser use Vivaldi, otherwise use Firefox. There is no reason to use brave whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

2.2 million compared to the 33 million population of the province of KPK. The same proportion in Gaza would be 120k people. Moreover, the token Arabs in the IDF are not comparable to the likes of the Frontier Corps, the Pakistan Rangers or the IX Corp.

There is a reason that Pakistan eventually fully integrated the 'federally administered' tribal areas. Just ask America what happens when you send in a bunch of troops that can't even begin to pronounce the language, nevermind understand local culture.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No dumbass. What I meant was that the Pakistani Army specifically used natives of KPK in their attack, y'know so that it was certain that they would care about the civilians since they were the soldiers' own people. Obviously IDF soldiers do not consider Palestinian kin, as proven by the 200 or more Palestinians killed every year. And obviously the IDF couldn't give 2 shits about their conduct towards the Arabs.

And no the population didn't leave? Where the fuck did you get that from. It was bloody urban fighting all the way down the valley and up the glaciers and mountain sides. And no how would you separate the Taliban from the civilians, cause they were also mostly locals.

And yes Pakistani troops are better behaved in their own country. As proven by the ongoing military occupation of multiple northern territories as well as a mission to police Karachi. Go to currently occupied, previously Taliban controlled territory, every shop shutter is covered in Praise for the Army.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Evangelicals waiting for the end times so that they can take over the holy land.

view more: ‹ prev next ›