lambalicious

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Discusión Random Semanal - Semana del 14/10/24 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Igual por acá. Vale la pena, pero no taaaaaaanto.

Discusión Random Semanal - Semana del 14/10/24 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Buenas de vuelta owo

Discusión Random Semanal - Semana del 14/10/24 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

¡De hecho sí, tengo una! Una de las mejores inversiones que he hecho en mi vida. A diferencia de todos los servicios enshittificados de ahora, SDF es un pago de una vez de por vida.

Canadian man reading date never knows which is day and which is month unless day is above 12 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

, with neither knowing if that is 6 months or over a year.

I mean, that's the kind of ambiguity that makes exes hot, right?

...right?

YSK: PayPal is updating their “Privacy Statement” policy to automatically share data about you with retailers. Policy takes effect 2024-11-27. Requires opt out by user to deny sharing in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah but still at the cost for a private citizen, right?

So, not in this economy.

Or is the cost of the lawsuit prepaid by the State?

Discusión Random Semanal - Semana del 14/10/24 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Buenas buenas.

Mi cuenta de lemmy es de por ahí, pero pensaba que tal vez debería tener una en feddit igual.

Ya saben, para los memes y los gatos.

Discusión Random Semanal - Semana del 14/10/24 in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Buenos días buenas noches.

YSK: PayPal is updating their “Privacy Statement” policy to automatically share data about you with retailers. Policy takes effect 2024-11-27. Requires opt out by user to deny sharing in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

What? As a private citizen? in +this* economy?

Wasn't the point of stuff like the GDPR that the governments would be the ones doing the enforcing and the suing?

Comment under a YouTube video on falling fertility rates. in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Getting large numbers of people into space will be prohibitive for a long time.

I'm content with getting the billionaires into space. Preferably on a Sun-oriented path. Since getting them into submarines so far hasn't catched on...

Comment under a YouTube video on falling fertility rates. in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I'm trying to find the button to upvote you twice but I can't find it. But I'm definitively starring this comment in the least.

Fediverse enshittification in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, it's to be expected. Because other platforms have muscle from those companies (Nintendo is basically from the land of the Yakuza, and they do behave as such towards their customers) so that commentary on their stuff in those platforms is sanitized or corporationized. On lemmy you can, for the most part, comment on how you really feel about a corporation.

Fediverse enshittification in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This pretty much. For as much as people are concerned that the "lack of UX" or the "discoverability" problems keeps people out, the important thing is it keeps normies out.

As I've seen before on some posts on the Fediverse discussing proprietary platforms, we all already know this. We saw FB went to shit as soon as it started allowing uneducated users.

14
RFC 9557: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps with Additional Information (datatracker.ietf.org)
 

RFC 3339, the "alternative" to ISO 8061, was extended to RFC 9957, which also allows adding interpretative tags.

Sounds like unnecessary complexification to me. What is wrong if anything with "2024-04-26"?

315
It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too. (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/programmer_humor
187 comments fedilink
 

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

20
How do you get themes? Are [desktop]-look.org sites trustworthy? (lemmy.sdf.org)
 

Hey everyone I was wondering how do you spice up your cursors, icons, themes, etc., In particular for desktop environments such as XFCE, Mate. Are there any good repositories to use?

I've taken a look at a number of apparently cloned sites like "xfce-look.org", "kde-look.org", "gnome-look.org", but while they seem to show a wide offering of themes, it seems downloading from them is blocked via uBO since it reports a "fp2" fingerprinting script without which apparently downloads are not enabled. Are those sites trustworthy? They seem to be associated to a "OpenDesktop" initiative of which the only reputation I can find is that they were added to EasyList Privacy blocklist.

If there are other alternative hubs or repos from which to theme a distro (as agnostically as posisble) that'd be welcome info.

Cheers. Thanks. Et cetera.

5
Standards shouldn't be behind a paywall (lemmy.world)
 

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.world/post/9470764

  • ISO 8601 is paywalled
  • RFC allows a space instead of a T (e.g. 2020-12-09 16:09:...) which is nicer to read.
2
Anything of interest happen in 9-11? (en.wikipedia.org)
 

I've seen the Wikipedia article on year 9 doesn't mention anything of relevance happening during November. Closest thing seems to be September. Since people around have spent a few years making lots of ruckus about how the date with "9, 11" has some sort of importance as a date, I was wondering if I'm missing something here.

1
What is the need of T in the new (2019) time format? (lemmy.sdf.org)
 

Basically title. 2019 edition of the Standard denotes the "T" prefix to time as mandatory (except in "unambiguous contexts"):

01:29:59 is now actually T01:29:59, with the former form now designated as an alternative

But date does not have a "D" prefix, not even in "ambiguous contexts".

1973-09-11 never needs to be something like eg.: D1973-09-11

Anyone know the reasoning behind this change and what is the intended use? The only time-only format with separators that I can think would be undecidable in ambiguous contexts would be hh:mm which I guess could be mistaken for bible verses?

1
2023-08-13: Kindly proposing a logo / banner for this community (xkcd.com)
 

I mean, it's the obvious choice. So why not? Maybe we can do with the zoom on the cat if there is a better version.

view more: next ›