I doubt this would change anything that was already built in C# but it enables the use of C# for smaller independent scripts. Stuff you might use Python, Bash or Powershell for. It still requires a runtime so not quite as portable as Bash/Pwsh but I'd take a C# script over a Python one most days.
kogasa
You can imagine tracing a path along a Klein bottle to see that it only has one side. To get more precise than that requires some topological context. If you slice it down the middle it turns into two Möbius strips and an orientation of the Klein bottle would induce an orientation of the strips, which are non-orientable. Alternately it has zero top integer homology, which you can get from looking at a triangulation. The orientable double cover of a Klein bottle is a torus, which is connected (if it were orientable, the double cover would be two disconnected Klein bottles).
There was the Margaritaville episode. I think that said... something... about capitalism and economics.
But I think the political commentary got a lot less pointed around the time hindsight kicked in on the climate change episodes. Kinda felt like the recurring theme was "everyone is an idiot, even us." Giant Douche v. Turd Sandwich felt a bit enlightened centristy.
Hey, I love Community
Seasons 1 and 3 are also missing 1 or 2 episodes each because a guest star's royalty agreement renegotiation fell through
I understand those are food words but I'm incapable of picturing those things in combination as a food item
Algebras have two operations by definition and the one thing they have in common is that the multiplication distributes over addition.
Yes, there is no notion of inverses without an identity, the definition of an inverse is in terms of an identity.
Stop posting.
As long as we can put an upper bound on gayness (or more specifically on each totally ordered subset of people under the is-gayer-than relation) this follows from Zorn's lemma.
It's also true by virtue of the fact that the set of all people who will have ever lived is finite, but "the existence of a maximal element in a poset" just screams Zorn's lemma.
Distributivity is a requirement for non associative algebras. So whatever structure is left is not one of those
1 = Ω0 = Ω(Ω + Ω) = ΩΩ + ΩΩ = Ω + Ω = 0
so distributivity is out or else 1 = 0
I'm sure it didn't actually run the command and is just emulating the outout
Hold on to your hat
http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
and, you guessed it,
https://thebestmotherfucking.website/