kartoffelsaft

Did this in Odin (very hashed together, especially finding the last number in part 2):

package day1

import "core:fmt"
import "core:strings"
import "core:strconv"
import "core:unicode"

p1 :: proc(input: []string) {
    total := 0

    for line in input {
        firstNum := line[strings.index_proc(line, unicode.is_digit):][:1]
        lastNum := line[strings.last_index_proc(line, unicode.is_digit):][:1]

        calibrationValue := strings.concatenate({firstNum, lastNum})
        defer delete(calibrationValue)

        num, ok := strconv.parse_int(calibrationValue)

        total += num
    }

    // daggonit thought it was the whole numbers
    /*
    for line in input {
        firstNum := line

        fFrom := strings.index_proc(firstNum, unicode.is_digit)
        firstNum = firstNum[fFrom:]

        fTo := strings.index_proc(firstNum, proc(r:rune)->bool {return !unicode.is_digit(r)})
        if fTo == -1 do fTo = len(firstNum)
        firstNum = firstNum[:fTo]


        lastNum := line
        lastNum = lastNum[:strings.last_index_proc(lastNum, unicode.is_digit)+1]
        lastNum = lastNum[strings.last_index_proc(lastNum, proc(r:rune)->bool {return !unicode.is_digit(r)})+1:]

        calibrationValue := strings.concatenate({firstNum, lastNum})
        defer delete(calibrationValue)

        num, ok := strconv.parse_int(calibrationValue, 10)
        if !ok {
            fmt.eprintf("%s could not be parsed from %s", calibrationValue, line)
            return
        }

        total += num;
    }
    */

    fmt.println(total)
}

p2 :: proc(input: []string) {
    parse_wordable :: proc(s: string) -> int {
        if len(s) == 1 {
            num, ok := strconv.parse_int(s)
            return num
        } else do switch s {
            case "one"  : return 1
            case "two"  : return 2
            case "three": return 3
            case "four" : return 4
            case "five" : return 5
            case "six"  : return 6
            case "seven": return 7
            case "eight": return 8
            case "nine" : return 9
        }

        return -1
    }

    total := 0

    for line in input {
        firstNumI, firstNumW := strings.index_multi(line, {
            "one"  , "1",
            "two"  , "2",
            "three", "3",
            "four" , "4",
            "five" , "5",
            "six"  , "6",
            "seven", "7",
            "eight", "8",
            "nine" , "9",
        })
        firstNum := line[firstNumI:][:firstNumW]


        // last_index_multi doesn't seem to exist, doing this as backup
        lastNumI, lastNumW := -1, -1
        for {
            nLastNumI, nLastNumW := strings.index_multi(line[lastNumI+1:], {
                "one"  , "1",
                "two"  , "2",
                "three", "3",
                "four" , "4",
                "five" , "5",
                "six"  , "6",
                "seven", "7",
                "eight", "8",
                "nine" , "9",
            })

            if nLastNumI == -1 do break

            lastNumI += nLastNumI+1
            lastNumW  = nLastNumW
        }
        lastNum := line[lastNumI:][:lastNumW]

        total += parse_wordable(firstNum)*10 + parse_wordable(lastNum)
    }

    fmt.println(total)
}

Had a ton of trouble with part 1 until I realized I misinterpreted it. Especially annoying because the example was working fine. So paradoxically part 2 was easier than 1.

I don't think this can really be answered until after the fact. Anything that I (and I suspect most) people could say about an artstyle are going to be particular to an instance of that artsyle. If I'd give advice as someone who is neither an artist nor a game designer, what attracts me more than anything is a unique artstyle, which, if I'm gonna give a brutal opinion, starting from a vague category like 'pixel', 'hand drawn' or '3D' probably won't get you there.

I feel like I even struggle to answer your question at face value because it doesn't align well at all with how I conceptualize game art. For example, Cruelty Squad is a game that I don't think I'd have gotten if not for it's artsyle. Like, sure, it's 3D, but it's a lot more like a PilotRedSun animation than it is a game like TF2. Or take a game like Factorio: most of the assets of that game are pre-rendered 3D sprites, so despite being artisticly unique in a way that interests me it doesn't fit into the categories you've asked about. The best I can say is "I dunno", and I don't think anyone else can answer it further than that.

There is the Anno series of games, which are technically RTS games but if I'm honest I find them the most fun when I go out of my way to avoid combat/micromanagement. I've only played 1404, 2070, and 2205, 2070 being the best in my opinion, but it has a bad history with DRM so I'd suggest 1404 (known as "Dawn of Discovery" in the US because us americans are afraid of numbers apparently).

Edit: looking at the steam page it looks like they decided to take 1404 down and made a new page where the game is (mostly) unchanged besides requiring you to jump through all the BS hoops that 2070 did, so I'd say if you're gonna spend money get 1404 on GOG, or if you are willing to do unspeakable things go with 2070.

I just saw the second clue and realized the stuff I've been building might cause some misdirection. Guessing that clue will be harder to figure out than intended 🤷.

To be fair, that post specifically asks people who don't have a technical background. It can be used to show that laymen have the capacity to use a federated platform like lemmy, but not that they are a significant portion of the userbase (albeit that post does have a lot of replies).

One library I've become very fond of using is Raylib. It has a ridiculously simple interface. If you just want to program a game and don't want/need the details of OpenGL/Vulkan/DirectX (which I'd suggest you do at some point anyways), then It'd be my pick.

It's a setting you can change. The default is a "quick generation" mode which looks as similar to the world seed/settings as it can without taking the performance hit of actually generating it. But it can either be changed to generate the chunks genuinely out to the render distance (which would be lag hell for 128 chunks) or to only render already generated chunks (like you suspect). Only the latter works in multiplayer though.

Huh. When I took Calculus II in community college, the professor introduced sum notation and like 2/3 of the class was like "wow that's cool I didn't know about that". I don't remember ever being formally taught it before that but it still surprises be how few people where already familiar with it.

I haven't actually. I'll go do that now.

Moving the cursor will confuse bash and you can get the same effect by just omitting the last \n.

When I was testing it I did not get the same effect. Instead it would only put the background behind what I had typed and not the whole line. Doing it now it seems to be working with the omission. I would assume it's a terminal emulator bug because I believe I have changed emulators since I wrote it. I've now removed it, thanks for fixing a bug.

Avoid doing external commands in subshells when there’s a perfectly good prompt-expansion string that works.

I wanted my home directory to not get shortened to ~, and if there is some way to do that with \w it isn't easy to find out how.

Also, what's the reasoning for avoiding it (besides it being idiomatic)? I'm sure there is one, but I don't think I've run into it yet.

You seem to be generating several unnecessary blank lines

I just like the look of it, and I have the screen space to do it.

I have this in my laptop's .bashrc

PS1='\e[0m\n\e[40m[\e[32m\u\e[37m] [\e[31m\A \d\e[31m] [\e[33m`pwd`\e[37m]\e[K\n\e[K\n\e[1A'
PS0='\e[0m\n'

[username] [00:01 Thu Jan 1] [/home/username]
█

There is this excellent video which shows how a simple C program looks in assembly (don't worry about it being C, the program is simple enough to be understood without C knowledge). There's also this which does what the video shows automatically for you. Neither of these are fully sufficient to understand assembly but they are still incredibly useful resources.

Also: watch out for AT&T syntax vs Intel syntax if you're doing x86. It took me way to long to figure this out. And as another commenter mentioned look at TIS-100, but also some other similar games (sorted from easiest to hardest, TIS being harder than all of these): Human resource machine, EXAPUNKS, Shezhen I/O, and Box-256