federino

joined 5 months ago
MODERATOR OF
333
State why (programming.dev)
 
150
submitted 4 months ago by federino to c/[email protected]
 
254
I'm dangerous (programming.dev)
submitted 4 months ago by federino to c/[email protected]
 
188
I'm dangerous (programming.dev)
submitted 4 months ago by federino to c/[email protected]
 
382
Easy (programming.dev)
 
 

Every time I tried to enable the device auto mount on my second hard drive, it never worked. I always had to manually mount it through KDE's GUI whenever I wanted to access it's content.

I later researched and found out that I could edit the /etc/fstab file with my second hard drive's UUID, which caused it to always mount on startup as I wanted.

So my question is, why doesn't KDE auto mount also replicate this process of editing the /etc/fstab?

The KDE auto mount never worked on plasma 6, I believe it's something related to wayland (even though I don't understand how they could be related).

359
Melted (programming.dev)
 
183
Birthday (programming.dev)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by federino to c/[email protected]
 

That's some mad drawing skills btw

 

O homem mais trabalhador do Brasil (sarcasmo)

[–] federino 1 points 5 months ago

a população desbloquearia 100% do seu potencial e a sociedade avançaria 30 anos em 1 graças às dicas do Pablo Marçal

[–] federino 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it's okay to check what the app is going to access in your system. I'm just talking about the warning design, this comment suggests a different approach for a less alarming design.

[–] federino 51 points 5 months ago

I think they should just follow the example of every other app store; list the permissions in an easily understandable list and let the user decide whether or not they are comfortable with it.

Totally agree. The "verified" label will give new users enough comfort, and the ones who wish to know more will read the permissions.

[–] federino 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

It's not specific to browsers, but to every flatpak that is verified and has the potentially unsafe warning.

[–] federino 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

SEGURA O BONDE PAI 😎

[–] federino 1 points 5 months ago

thank you very much :)

[–] federino 2 points 5 months ago
[–] federino 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] federino 3 points 5 months ago
[–] federino 3 points 5 months ago

cool, that's interesting

[–] federino 3 points 5 months ago

ooooh yeah ♥️

[–] federino 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

the marketing is bad for them? I don't follow

view more: ‹ prev next ›