dragontamer

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The #1 pain point for pollsters is the prediction of the election demographics.

Polls and statistics are such that a general simple random sample has too little power / weak error bounds (I'm talking like +/-10%, nearly useless).

The easiest way to improve your error bounds is to make assumptions about the electorate makeup. IE: if you know the election will be 50% male and 50% female, you can poll 50 men and 50 women (rather than 100 random people, which might end up as 60 men and 40 women due to randomness).

Lather rinse repeat for other groupings (Latino, Asians, black, 18Y olds, 55Y olds, Rural, Urban, etc. etc.) and you get the gist of how this all works.

Alas: the male / female vote this year is completely worked because abortion is on the ballot. All pollsters know this. Their numbers are crap because the methodology is crap this year. It's impossible to predict women turnout.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

20+ out of 34 Senate for Democrats and narrow lead in the house.

That'd normally be exceptionally good news for the Democrats nominee. So I'm with the big theory that something funky is going on with the polls.

We are about to see the most split ticket voters of all time (Vote Democrat for Senate and House.... But vote for Trump in the Presidency), or people have been lying to pollsters somehow.... On a mass scale.

And I don't believe that split ticket voters exist in this election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

I'll be happy enough if its "just" Elon who loses out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Pascal programmers are confused.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

American voting game is one of turnout.

For Republicans, they are in the minority. But their will to vote is much higher. Pandering to his own supporters encourages the get out the vote effort in ways that Democrats are simply unable to do.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Puerto Rico has no electoral votes. But everyone born in Puerto Rico is a US Citizen.

Meaning Puerto Ricans who are currently living stateside (ex: studying at a university and staying enough months of the year to qualify for residency) can vote.


Similarly, a.... Californian.... who is living in Puerto Rico has no electoral votes. Because USA assigns votes by land.

Every Puerto Rican is a USA citizen who has the right to vote. As long as they're living in the correct area (ie: inside the 50 fully accepted states).

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Haitian migrants were legal btw.

Puerto Ricans likely remember the more racist times decades ago. And secondly, they are a much larger group than Haitians. So this is a much bigger mistake than the Haitian thing a few weeks ago..

No offense to any Haitians around here. Just talking about sizes and demographics. It's awful that we have a candidate who is so openly racist. But I'm happy that they're showing their colors while we can still defeat them at the ballot box.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

The endorsements come from the writers, not from leadership.

If a conservative owner owns a liberal set of writers, muzzling your writers and stopping endorsements is to the conservatives advantage.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Florida also has the Abortion ban on its ballots, so Women are likely going to vote in huge numbers.

Kinda sad that the Presidential election is riding on the coattails of other issues, but that's the nature of today's politics.

Florida is considered solidly red though. But all elections in the USA are a turnout issue.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

So yeah. LA Times, Washington Post and now Gannett conglomerate all made the same decision at roughly the same time.

This was preplanned.

I don't think this media takeover strategy is going to go as they hope. This makes the Democrats cause more real and heightens the stakes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Oil futures were down. Not actual oil.

An oil future in WTI makes you legally obligated to pickup the oil in West Texas or along its pipe network (most common pickup point is Arkansas IIRC).

So let's say you bought an oil future for $0 at $0 a barrel. And now 10,000 barrels of oil are waiting for pickup. And let's say you are a New York speculator and not actually someone with storage.

How do you get rid of the contract before you are penalized? Well, you sell it at -$10. But the guy who bought it for -$10 was also a New York speculator who thought the price couldn't go any lower.

By the end of the day, the speculators were selling the contract for -$40 a barrel, because the penalty for missing the pickup date is very heavy.

Eventually, some trucker 'Bought' the contract at -$40 and made free money as the trucker just had to go there and pick up the oil.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

J Lo and Bad Bunny?

At least I hope they helped. The Latino vote is stubbornly in the middle right now. Encouraging their vote looks like it'd help....

 

Despite all the doom scrolling, Harris has a comfortable lead in the electoral college right now.

The time for vibing is over. It's too late to change anyone's opinions (especially because national level events like debates are over). Harris will finish her Media Blitz soon (including a Fox News showing) while Trump retreats into his shell hoping no one notices how damn stupid his mouth is.

This is the time for doing. The focus should be on voter drives and other get out the vote pushes. It's mid October, and the October surprises are against Trump and in our favor.

It's not the lead we wanted but it's a lead nonetheless. Don't talk yourself out of believing this lead because of a bad poll or two.

 

TL;DR: Stellantis vehicles aren't selling. But its still nice to get a few interviews from a dealership, from CEOs, and other parties involved in Stellantis and talk about what they think is the problem.

Its a longer-form 15-minute video, but that's a good thing. (If anything, that's short for what they're trying to cover).

This isn't Tesla related directly, but overall car economics / competition is on topic around here. And Stellantis is involved in many EVs, PHEVs, and Hybrids that are cross-shopped with Tesla anyway.

 

Stock down 7.5% today after 10/10 Robotaxi event. Elon arrives nearly an hour late and showed off concepts of a plan of cybercab and cyberbus.

 

Not Tesla but Fisker EVa are famously connected and techno-enabled.

As Fisker goes through this bankruptcy, we now have some data points on how always connected cars behave as their servers get shutdown. It's uhhhhh, not looking good.

 

The title to this article is too long. I slightly edited it down slightly bending Rule5.

Still, Elon Musk and Kimball Musk both are immigrants who have likely bent or even broken immigration law as they came here to USA.

174
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I have the filing in another topic on this community (Greenspan v Musk topic). But this blogpost / commentary is easier for people to read.

 

Aaron Greenspan files court documents vs Elon Musk regarding alleged fraud in Tesla.

view more: next ›