Yes, these are documented features and not some kind of obscure off-label workaround. What I mean is that the use of these features serves as a workaround (or, if you like, an "alternative") when simple mouse selection should work but behaves erratically.
ccp
Have you ever tried just using forward slashes anyway? It works more or less some of the time.
Annoying little quirks of text highlighting and navigation. Oopsie, you moved an extra quarter of a centimeter to the left of the paragraph you tried to highlight starting from the bottom. That means you want everything, right? Yeah we're highlighting everything. And so on.
Fortunately I've picked up some workarounds over the years:
Trying to highlight text in a hyperlink: hold alt
Methods of selecting text blocks (e.g., when normal mouse-select is doing bizarre stuff):
- Try highlighting from end to beginning
- Click point A, hold shift, click point B
- Double-click first word of desired selection to highlight it, or triple-click a paragraph, then highlight letters with shift-right, words with ctrl-shift-right, lines with shift-down, paragraphs with ctrl-shift-down. You'll see that, for example, when you use shift-down, some text on the line following the selected line is also selected, corresponding to the length of the initial selection before the hotkey was pressed. You can use relevant combos in the opposite direction to de-select this. Or press shift-end to highlight only to the end of the line where your current selection ends, and shift-home to deselect to the beginning of the line. Ctrl-shift-end/home will do the same but for the entire page/document.
- Some other useful hotkeys are available during text input -- I make heavy use of shift+pgup/pgdn to extend selections, but this seems to work in Excel, Notepad++, etc., not in this web browser text input field, for example. Holding shift while clicking also extends selections as in the read-only context; holding ctrl while clicking arbitrarily adds to selection just as in the file browser.
I tried to give it a fair shake at this, but it didn't quite cut it for my purposes. I might be pushing it out of its wheelhouse though. My problem is that, while it can rhyme more or less adequately, it seems to have trouble with meter, and when I do this kind of thing, it revolves around rhyme/meter perfectionism. Of course, if I were trying to actually get something done with it instead of just seeing if it'll come up with something accidentally cool, it would be reasonable to take what it manages to do and refine it. I do understand to some extent how LLMs work, in terms of what tokens are and why this means it can't play Wordle, etc., and I can imagine this also has something to do with why it's bad at tightly lining up syllable counts and stress patterns.
That said, I've had LLMs come up with some pretty dank shit when given the chance: https://vgy.me/album/EJ3yPvM0
Most of it is either the LLMs shitting themselves or GPT doing that masturbatory optimism thing. Da Vinci's "Suspicious mind..." in the second image is a little bit heavyish though. And those last two ("Gangsterland" and "My name is B-Rabbit, I'm down with M.C.s, and I'm on the microphone spittin' hot shit") are god damn funny.
P->J completely inverts the orientations of the cognitive functions (Ti Ne Si Fe -> Ni Te Fi Se), it wouldn't reflect a singular change but a wholesale shift in how you take in and act on information (also J doesn't mean judgmental).
I remember reading great Chick dissections at Enter the Jabberwock back in the day. I think it's not up anymore but still accessible on wayback https://web.archive.org/web/20071011174941/http://enterthejabberwock.com/?cat=12
neopets.com/neoboards/boardlist.phtml?board=55
fixed
Actually, I believe you'll find, if you refer to the title, that it is a movie about two days after its time