badbrainstorm

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And stuck it up his (yeah)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

I heard that he shamed and belittled the couch for not getting pregnant, and said if he ever had the power, he would revoke its right to vote

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Double bonus if he shames and belittles the couch for not getting pregnant, and says if it were up to him, it would not be allowed to vote

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just the once though. Then balance/expand the SCOTUS. Give the Republicans a few to make it fair. Vote to overturn, and forget it ever happened. Logical people can't get that upset that the only thing he did with his new king powers is do what it takes to save democracy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I voted Hilary because lesser of two evils. But I despise her snake in the grass ass! And me not liking her has absolutely nothing to do with her gender.

But you are right that there are many that hate on a strong, vocal female (AOC).

There are still many strong females out there that would have done better than Hillary and would make great leaders

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Just throw the six that voted for immunity in prison for treason. A fate worse than death

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I absolutely love AOC as well, but she'll be in the Bernie boat. Too "socialist", and would push many centrist to vote red.

I don't think Michelle is really interested, but it was just an exciting thought to me when I was seeing it pop up.

I don't know if I'd love it, but Andy Beshear could pull his Kentucky magic, and possibly steal a bunch of Trump voters with the hayseeds.

It's all looking like wishful thinking though, regardless

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I didn't say it wasn't risky. I'm saying what I heard. But, I also don't think it's that risky.

She would be a much better debater and candidate, and it would likely erase much of the voter apathy with the huge 40 and under group. Especially with abortion and womans rights on the table.

And I'm a huge Bernie supporter, but we've seen several times now that the DNC isn't going to give him a chance. So who else you got cause Bernie's chance died in 2016

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I heard quite a few people earlier in the year stating that the plan was for Joe to bow out last minute due to health issue, and announce that Michelle Obama would be the candidate. I know it's probably not likely, but it's an exciting thought. Someone like Newsom would be another decent option

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I vote everyone continue to use this template for memes, as Drakes faces makes me physically ill

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Ah, the Uber space Tesla option. Classy!

I'll take a whalers on the moon shirt if you make it to Luna Park

485
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Stop enshitification 3 years ago!

FCC to vote to restore net neutrality rules, reversing Trump By David Shepardson April 2, 20243:51 PM PDTUpdated 4 hours ago People look at data on their mobiles as internet wire cables on switch hub are shown in background People look at data on their mobiles as background with internet wire cables on switch hub is projected in this picture

WASHINGTON, April 2 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission will vote to reinstate landmark net neutrality rules and assume new regulatory oversight of broadband internet that was rescinded under former President Donald Trump, the agency's chair said.

The FCC told advocates on Tuesday of the plan to vote on the final rule at its April 25 meeting.

The commission voted 3-2 in October on the proposal to reinstate open internet rules adopted in 2015 and re-establish the commission's authority over broadband internet.

Net neutrality refers to the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.

FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel confirmed the planned commission vote in an interview with Reuters. "The pandemic made clear that broadband is an essential service, that every one of us - no matter who we are or where we live - needs it to have a fair shot at success in the digital age," she said.

An essential service requires oversight and in this case we are just putting back in place the rules that have already been court-approved that ensures that broadband access is fast, open and fair." Reinstating the rules has been a priority for President Joe Biden, who signed a July 2021 executive order encouraging the FCC to reinstate net neutrality rules adopted under Democratic President Barack Obama. Democrats were stymied for nearly three years because they did not take majority control of the five-member FCC until October.

Under Trump, the FCC had argued the net neutrality rules were unnecessary, blocked innovation and resulted in a decline in network investment by internet service providers, a contention disputed by Democrats.

Rosenworcel has said the reclassification would give the FCC important new national security tools. The agency said in its initial proposal that rules could give it "more robust authority to require more entities to remove and replace" equipment and services from Chinese companies like Huawei (HWT.UL) and ZTE (000063.SZ)

Republican FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr opposed the move, saying that since 2017 "broadband speeds in the U.S. have increased, prices are down (and) competition has intensified." He argued the plan would result in "government control of the internet."

Despite the 2017 repeal, a dozen states now have net neutrality laws or regulations in place. Industry groups abandoned legal challenges to those state requirements in May 2022.

view more: next ›