arscynic

joined 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

During an inconspicuous math class in my final year of highschool I suddendly had enough of going in front of the classroom to solve a math problem. I love math, was good at it, but doing it live doesn't sit well with mathematical anxiety. When it was my turn the teacher asked “Marcus, want to go in front please?” Then it hit me that that's a question. So I gathered my guts while my heart was racing and replied “Would you mind if I said I'd rather not?” The teacher laughed and said “Yeah that's fine.” My classmates' minds were blown. I didn't need to go in front for the rest of the year with which he made me king. I loved him; we always appreciated each other's humour.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

“On Windows 10 PCs without an ESU subscription, however, any security flaws found from that day forward will remain unpatched, making those PCs increasingly vulnerable to online attacks.”

“Windows unpatched […] increasingly vulnerable to online attacks” is a facetious statement since the operating system is inherently malware.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

Yes, but Recall is spyware by design posing as a benign feature. This kind of unethical behaviour I vehemently oppose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

But it doesn’t matter, because everyone else uses Gmail, so any time I communicate with someone, Google reads my emails, despite the fact that I never agreed to their oppressive ToS.

That's avoidable by PGP encrypting your emails though. But I'm sure you know that, and I'm sure you meant that getting most people to use PGP is a pipe dream.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I couldn't wait to post this obligatory fragment of Parks and Recreation - Ron vs. Online Privacy: https://youtu.be/8xn1rO1oQmk

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It's more about what Microsoft enforces—spyware—than what other people do.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm afraid this comment shows a severe underestimation of the gravity of the issue. Windows recall doesn't stop at borders even if it were illegal there.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Once you send something the person at the other end is in control of what happens to it.

True, but this is the beauty of trust. I decide to communicate one way or another with someone depending on the level of trust. Them deciding to break that trust is a risk I chose to take. However, I do not choose to communicate with Microsoft, whatsoever. Windows Recall is the most blatant piece of spyware ever; beyond comprehension how this is so normalized.

 

If one chats/mails with a person using Windows, despite using secure private protocols, every message will be stored by Microsoft's Windoze Recall. Either I'm missing something but this feature seems like the most grotesque breach in online privacy/security.

What are ways to avoid this except for using obfuscated text?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

“I reduced the insolent crowd of carriages which cumber our streets, for this luxury of speed destroys its own aim;” —Memoirs of Hadrian by Marguerite Yourcenar

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

This immoral prick continues to push my Stoic practise to its limit.