Now of course, those are fantasy situations and I don't think there's anything wrong with porn existing that plays into fantasies that would be unethical if done IRL, so long as the actors consent to it and all that. HOWEVER, the fact that these fantasies exist and are widespread enough to have lots of videos produces about them is a pretty telling sign about the environment the Mormon church creates. Indeed, the system of pastors meeting with minors alone to discuss their personal sexual health is a vector for abuse. And given the church's history and founding, it probably is intentional
Supermariofan67
You didn't answer the question
The issue is whether the data is collected by a known third party tracker domain which would be blocked by an adblocker
Nope, the source code is available but it is proprietary software because the license forbids distributing modified versions, among other things
Lots of malware gets hosted using dynamic DNS domains, so they (or more likely some bot) probably saw the domain frequently showing up in malicious activity and blocked it without understanding that it itself isn't the source of the malicious activity.
They are an anti science organization. They oppose nuclear power, GMOs, etc.
You can use cryptsetup-reencrypt to encrypt an existing disk in place with LUKS. Then you just have to modify the initramfs/bootloader/fstab to point to the new configuration. See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/Device_encryption#Encrypt_an_existing_unencrypted_file_system
When it was brand new there were some edge case bugs that broke on certain workflows and hardware, but that's pretty much entirely fixed now and I'm guessing for a long time now it's been more universally stable than pulseaudio was.
Also, some people just pointlessly dislike anything that's new, or because it breaks their spacebar heating
Obscenity law needs to be eliminated entirely at this point. It's archaic entirely. Luckily, convicting under the Miller test is rare since pretty much everything has "serious artistic or political value", but these laws shouldn't be on the books at all. Needless violation of the first amendment to punish victimless crimes.
It would be more newsworthy if a Chinese exporter did label the customs disclosure accurately. Every time I order a package internationally it comes labeled as "books" or something similarly vague