OccultIconoclast

joined 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago (1 children)

I wanna see a politician campaign on creating a weak economy.

Crash the housing market! Make the billionaires lose money! Collapse the oil industry!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

Sure, I can ignore the phone, but it's quiet and distracting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 minutes ago (2 children)

Phone rings

I'm doing the dishes and my hands are wet

I'm sitting on the toilet

I'm in an online game

I just got the baby to sleep

I'm pipetting a solution

I'm with a customer

My hands are covered in engine grease

I'm meditating

I'm on my bicycle

I have gloves on

I'm carrying heavy furniture

I'm driving

I'm swimming at the pool

I'm in the middle of a set

I'm trying to put out a grease fire on the stove

Sure, I can ignore the phone, but it's loud and distracting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

It's like when you're having a conversation on autopilot.

"Mum, can I play with my frisbee?" Sure, honey. "Mum, can I have an ice cream from the fridge?" Sure can. "Mum, can I invade Poland?" Absolutely, whatever you want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

What about monkey head planet?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

Cause it's fucking bullshit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hello I'm the left's official spokesperson and I think I can clear up this confusion.

A woman is someone who wants to be a woman.

A husband is someone who wants to be a husband and has consent from the person they're a husband of.

Both of these words are identities, and letting people be who they want to be when it doesn't affect other people is one of the values of the left. So you can go ahead and extend this reasoning to all personal identities that don't harm others, and I think that answers your question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Exotic didn't say a single word about legal advantages.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Ain't nobody should have to snitch to the cops about nothing if they don't want to. Shouldn't require marriage at all.

Also, if marriage isn't about love, then how come you can't marry your sister? I'm not advocating for sister marriage, I'm just pointing out it definitely is about love, and that's why marrying your sister is weird.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Abolish legal marriage!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

That's bullshit. The government shouldn't be deporting people for refusing to participate in their system of regulating love. Just let people live where they want.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Marriage isn't a legal construct. The government doesn't have the right to own people's relationships. They can say they do, it doesn't make it true.

 
view more: next ›